Paratext 標記檢查對我來說不起作用。例如,我在一個原本使用阿拉伯文字腳本的專案文本中輸入 \w bob\w*,心想「bob」這個詞絕不可能出現在我們的詞彙表中。但當我執行標記檢查時,它並沒有針對該節經文提出任何警告。
提供一些背景資訊可能會有幫助,雖然我不認為這是主要問題。
我們無法使用 PT 的「Bib Terms tool to Glossary linking」(聖經術語工具至詞彙表連結功能),因為 PT 無法處理所有詞彙表條目都位於詞彙表的 \c 1 中的情況。很久以前我們發現,當 PT 嘗試顯示(目前的 253 個)詞彙表條目時,系統變得完全無回應,因此我們將其拆分到不同的章節中。我理解當詞彙表條目位於不同章節時,連結功能將無法運作,也想不出可行的設計方式來使其運作,所以我不介意失去這個功能。
但我不明白這如何或為何會影響 \w 與詞彙表中 \k 的連結。詞彙表本質上是一個大型文本文件,因此某些行上有 \c 2 或 \c 3 不應影響此類檢查。但正如我所說,標記檢查並沒有告訴我 \w 條目不在詞彙表中。(事實上,如果 PT 出於某種原因僅簡單地搜尋 \c 1,我預期它會警告我 100% 的條目,因為沒有任何 \k 條目位於 \c 1 中。)
The Paratext Markers Check is not working for me. For example, I typed \w bob\w* into the text of an otherwise Arabic script project, thinking there's no way that "bob" is in our glossary. But when I ran the markers check, it didn't say anything about that particular verse.
Some background might help, though I don't believe it's the main problem.
We can't use PT's "Bib Terms tool to Glossary linking" because PT can't handle all our glossary entries being in \c 1 of the Glossary. Quite a long time ago we found that PT was becoming completely unresponsive as it tried to display the (currently 253) glossary entries, so we split it up into chapters. I understand that the linking won't work when the glossary entries are in different chapters, and can't think of a viable way that it could be designed to work, so I'm happy to not complain about that loss of functionality.
But I don't see how or why that would affect connecting \w with \k in the glossary. The glossary is essentially a large text document, so the fact that some lines have \c 2 or \c 3 on them shouldn't affect that kind of check. But, as I said, the markers check isn't telling me that \w entries aren't in the glossary. (In fact, if PT is simplistically searching only \c 1 for some reason, I'd expect it to warn me about 100% of the entries since none of the \k entries are in \c 1.)
機器翻譯自 English