Paratext 标记检查对我来说不起作用。例如,我在一个阿拉伯文脚本项目的文本中输入了 \w bob\w*,我认为“bob”这个词不可能在我们的词汇表中。但当我运行标记检查时,它并没有提到那个特定的经文。
一些背景信息可能会有所帮助,尽管我不认为这是主要问题。
我们无法使用 PT 的“圣经术语工具到词汇表的链接”功能,因为 PT 无法处理所有词汇表条目都在词汇表的 \c 1 中的情况。很久以前我们发现,当 PT 试图显示(目前的 253 个)词汇表条目时,它会变得完全无响应,所以我们将其拆分到了不同的章节中。我理解当词汇表条目位于不同章节时,链接功能将无法工作,也想不出可行的设计方法使其能够工作,所以我对失去这一功能并不抱怨。
但我不明白这如何或为何会影响词汇表中 \w 与 \k 的连接。词汇表基本上是一个大型文本文档,因此某些行上有 \c 2 或 \c 3 不应该影响这种类型的检查。但是,正如我所说,标记检查并没有告诉我 \w 条目不在词汇表中。(事实上,如果 PT 出于某种原因只简单地搜索 \c 1,我预计它会警告我 100% 的条目,因为没有 \k 条目在 \c 1 中。)
The Paratext Markers Check is not working for me. For example, I typed \w bob\w* into the text of an otherwise Arabic script project, thinking there's no way that "bob" is in our glossary. But when I ran the markers check, it didn't say anything about that particular verse.
Some background might help, though I don't believe it's the main problem.
We can't use PT's "Bib Terms tool to Glossary linking" because PT can't handle all our glossary entries being in \c 1 of the Glossary. Quite a long time ago we found that PT was becoming completely unresponsive as it tried to display the (currently 253) glossary entries, so we split it up into chapters. I understand that the linking won't work when the glossary entries are in different chapters, and can't think of a viable way that it could be designed to work, so I'm happy to not complain about that loss of functionality.
But I don't see how or why that would affect connecting \w with \k in the glossary. The glossary is essentially a large text document, so the fact that some lines have \c 2 or \c 3 on them shouldn't affect that kind of check. But, as I said, the markers check isn't telling me that \w entries aren't in the glossary. (In fact, if PT is simplistically searching only \c 1 for some reason, I'd expect it to warn me about 100% of the entries since none of the \k entries are in \c 1.)
机器翻译自 English