我想澄清一下我對 Paratext 中此情況的理解。
當我有一個詞是兩個詞的縮合形式,且這兩個詞都有詞綴時,我無法在 Paratext 中對其進行逐字對照(interlinearise)。
當我為縮合形式添加詞形分析時,我可以輸入第一個詞的所有形態素,但如果第二個詞有前綴,Paratext 不會接受,因為「前綴必須位於詞幹之前」。實際上存在兩個詞幹,且第二個詞幹上有前綴,但 Paratext 似乎只識別第一個為詞幹。
示例:
u+ nir +yi soni - Paratext 接受此格式,因為它將 +yi 視為 nir 的後綴。但這並非正確的情況,我們希望的是:
u+ nir yi+ soni - Paratext 不接受此格式,因為「前綴必須位於詞幹之前」。在此,soni 是一個詞幹。
是否有可能更改此行為,使 Paratext 識別第二個詞幹並允許前綴?
謝謝
anon282486
I would like to clarify what I think the situation in Paratext is.
When I have a word which is a contraction of two words, and both of those two words have affixes, then I can’t interlearise it in Paratext.
When I add a word parse for the contraction, I can put all the morphemes of the first word, but if the second has a prefix then Paratext does not accept it, because “Prefixes must come before a stem”. There are in fact two stems, and there is a prefix on the second stem, but Paratext is presumabling only recognising the first as a stem.
Example:
u+ nir +yi soni - Paratext accepts this because it sees +yi as a suffix to nir. But this is not the correct situation, we want:
u+ nir yi+ soni - Paratext will not accept this because “Prefixes must come before a stem”. Here, soni is a stem.
Is it possible to change this behaviour so that Paratext recognises the second stem and allows the prefix?
Thanks
anon282486
機器翻譯自 English