0 votes
399 views

I’m running a intel based MacBook Pro: 2.3 GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7, 32 GB. I’m using VMware Fusion. I find some pretty slow lag times between double clicks. 3 seconds x 700 clicks = 35 minutes of waiting per day.

Have you found Parallels to run faster than VMware Fusion? 2-3 hours a week of times savings would be worth the switch.

Paratext by (251 points) | 399 views

2 Answers

0 votes
Best answer

@Clear7419 Thanks for sharing your experience. It does seem like Parallels is a superior product. Hopefully other users won’t have the same issue though, as VMWare Fusion offers a free license for non-commercial use.

by [Moderator]
(2.1k points)

I’ve not used vmWare Fusion much recently, but I can tell you a bit more about Parallels Desktop:

You have two licensing options:
$80 for “Standard Edition” which does not expire, or
$100 for “Pro Edition” for a license which will expire in 1 year, but can be renewed for $50 for another year.

Parallels releases an upgrade for Parallels every year sometime in August. “Pro Edition” receives this upgrade free/automatically. For “Standard Edition”, one must bay $50. In past years they allowed free upgrades for anyone who purchased the older version anytime in August or September.

If you upgrade to the newer version every year, then the costs end up being about the same. In my opinion, none of the additional features of the Pro Edition would benefit the typical Paratext user. But if your Mac has 32GB of RAM, maybe you’d want the Pro Edition so that you can allocate more than 8GB of RAM to the Windows VM.

I buy the “Standard Edition” for $80, and then skip upgrade years when the upgrade doesn’t seem compelling. If I skip an upgrade for one year, then I’ve halved my annual cost for Parallels. You can get the Parallels Upgrade price if you own ANY previous version, so waiting a year or two to upgrade is not an issue. You may, however, have compatibility issues with newer versions of macOS or Windows and older versions of Parallels.

Another plus for Parallels is that their support is very responsive. About 2 years ago a Parallels Desktop update broke Paratext, but Parallels was very quick to acknowledge the bug, offer a work-around which we could apply immediately, and then fix the bug permanently in an update.

Does Paratext’s telemetry tell how many users are running Paratext in VMs on Macs?

0 votes

Well, I downloaded a trial version of parallels and it was substantially faster. Sold.

by (251 points)

Related questions

+1 vote
1 answer 356 views
I wanted to share this info, in case some people didn't know. VMWare offers a free version of their VMWare Fusion ... can be found here: VMware Fusion Player - Personal Use License
[Moderator]
james_post
2.1k
asked Oct 21, 2021
0 votes
2 answers 3 views
I am running Paratext 9.5 on my Macbook Pro (M1 Processor) using Parallels Desktop Version 26.3.3. Paratext ... anyone else had this problem? Any advice would be appreciated.
anon055151 176 asked May 30
0 votes
2 answers 90 views
As the title says. I've been using macOS 15 and parallels 20 and I've begun noticing a significant delay after ... , 36gb memory, 1tb storage). IS anyone else experiencing this?
ASmith 169 asked Oct 29, 2024
0 votes
2 answers 515 views
I'm using a 2018 mbp, 2.6 i7, 16gb memory. parallels 18. macOS 13.4.1 Beginning today, for the first ... even know how to go about diagnosing this. Does anyone have suggestions?
ASmith 169 asked Jun 25, 2023
0 votes
5 answers 922 views
Running PT on Parallels on my 2017 MacBook Pro (16 GB Ram) with an Intel Processor is smooth sailing. Thinking about ... runs it with success?). How is the performance? Dietmar
DietmarWP 109 asked May 10, 2021
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
They all joined together constantly in prayer, along with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brothers.
Acts 1:14
3,037 questions
5,994 answers
5,661 comments
2,022 users