0 votes
417 views

I’m running a intel based MacBook Pro: 2.3 GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7, 32 GB. I’m using VMware Fusion. I find some pretty slow lag times between double clicks. 3 seconds x 700 clicks = 35 minutes of waiting per day.

Have you found Parallels to run faster than VMware Fusion? 2-3 hours a week of times savings would be worth the switch.

Paratext by (251 points) | 417 views

2 Answers

0 votes
Best answer

@Clear7419 Thanks for sharing your experience. It does seem like Parallels is a superior product. Hopefully other users won’t have the same issue though, as VMWare Fusion offers a free license for non-commercial use.

by [Moderator]
(2.1k points)

I’ve not used vmWare Fusion much recently, but I can tell you a bit more about Parallels Desktop:

You have two licensing options:
$80 for “Standard Edition” which does not expire, or
$100 for “Pro Edition” for a license which will expire in 1 year, but can be renewed for $50 for another year.

Parallels releases an upgrade for Parallels every year sometime in August. “Pro Edition” receives this upgrade free/automatically. For “Standard Edition”, one must bay $50. In past years they allowed free upgrades for anyone who purchased the older version anytime in August or September.

If you upgrade to the newer version every year, then the costs end up being about the same. In my opinion, none of the additional features of the Pro Edition would benefit the typical Paratext user. But if your Mac has 32GB of RAM, maybe you’d want the Pro Edition so that you can allocate more than 8GB of RAM to the Windows VM.

I buy the “Standard Edition” for $80, and then skip upgrade years when the upgrade doesn’t seem compelling. If I skip an upgrade for one year, then I’ve halved my annual cost for Parallels. You can get the Parallels Upgrade price if you own ANY previous version, so waiting a year or two to upgrade is not an issue. You may, however, have compatibility issues with newer versions of macOS or Windows and older versions of Parallels.

Another plus for Parallels is that their support is very responsive. About 2 years ago a Parallels Desktop update broke Paratext, but Parallels was very quick to acknowledge the bug, offer a work-around which we could apply immediately, and then fix the bug permanently in an update.

Does Paratext’s telemetry tell how many users are running Paratext in VMs on Macs?

0 votes

Well, I downloaded a trial version of parallels and it was substantially faster. Sold.

by (251 points)

Related questions

0 votes
1 answer 347 views
Hello, and I apologize in advance for the wacky first question. I was using Paratext on a Windows 10 PC for some time and ... I can think of. Thank you in advance for your help.
Valera1865 108 asked Jan 19, 2024
+1 vote
1 answer 385 views
I wanted to share this info, in case some people didn't know. VMWare offers a free version of their VMWare Fusion ... can be found here: VMware Fusion Player - Personal Use License
[Moderator]
james_post
2.1k
asked Oct 21, 2021
0 votes
0 answers 25 views
Are there any recent reports of users running Paratext 9.x on an M-chip Mac? Early testing (i.e., ... /support.bible/8242/apple-m1-processor-parallels-and-paratext?show=8251#a8251
[Moderator]
james_post
2.1k
asked Jan 23
0 votes
2 answers 20 views
I am running Paratext 9.5 on my Macbook Pro (M1 Processor) using Parallels Desktop Version 26.3.3. Paratext ... anyone else had this problem? Any advice would be appreciated.
anon055151 176 asked May 30
0 votes
2 answers 117 views
As the title says. I've been using macOS 15 and parallels 20 and I've begun noticing a significant delay after ... , 36gb memory, 1tb storage). IS anyone else experiencing this?
ASmith 169 asked Oct 29, 2024
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
How good and pleasant it is when God’s people live together in unity!
Psalm 133:1
3,044 questions
6,003 answers
5,671 comments
2,026 users