0 голосов
385 просмотров

Currently, the work done in the Paratext Project Interlinearizer cannot be imported into Fieldworks directly, and even then only partially. The Project Interlinearizer can be use to make a highly literal back translation and that output can be exported to back translation project in Paratext and Fieldworks will bring that back translation in as a free translation when the Scripture is imported into Fieldworks. The limitation being that there must be a high level of conformity in the USFMs in both the vernacular and back translation projects, or Fieldworks can not match the back translation to the vernacular correctly.

It is true that Paratext can generate a “FlexText” version of the data from the Project Interlinearizer, but this feature is not able to transfer the parsing or the word glossing from the Paratext Project Interlinearizer to the Intelinear view of FLEx. Parsing or even word glossing between Paratext and Fieldworks are not compatible. As I understand it work on making a conversion process through “FlexText” has been discontinued in favor of integrating Paratext and Fieldworks to the point that both programs use the same databases. So for now, the analyst or translator has to decide if they wish to interlinearize in Paratext or Fieldworks.

Старое сообщение — показано на исходном языке
Paratext от [Expert]
(2,9тыс. очков)

снова показан | 385 просмотров

2 Ответов

0 голосов

I guess you could import the lexicon.xml file as a word/gloss list too and that might help. Perhaps if anyone is interested in doing this let me know here and that might encourage me to try it out. Having often publicly encouraged translators and consultants to build dictionaries and then lean on them while translating, I’m trying to do as I say.

Старое сообщение — показано на исходном языке
от (510 очков)
0 голосов

Any update on this or are we will kind of stuck choosing?

Старое сообщение — показано на исходном языке
от (184 очков)

Похожие вопросы

0 голосов
4 ответов 838 просмотров
Continuing the discussion from Importing Back Translation along with Vernacular into Fieldworks: Importing Back Translation ... translation but obviously that didn't work either.
jbabt 115 задал вопрос янв 9, 2017
0 голосов
0 ответов 251 просмотров
When importing Scripture from Paratext into Fieldworks, It is possible to have the back translation import along with the ... Paratext has to be linked to the vernacular project.
[Expert]
Jeff_Shrum
2,9тыс.
задал вопрос дек 2, 2016
0 голосов
2 ответов 396 просмотров
Возможно ли импортировать интерлинеарный текст из FLEx в PT9? Спасибо
listentwice 1,2тыс. задал вопрос апр 8, 2022
0 голосов
2 ответов 402 просмотров
When you make corrections to \toc headers, the Book Names under Scripture Reference Settings don’t seem to update automatically. Is that by design?
аноним задал вопрос апр 10, 2015
0 голосов
2 ответов 452 просмотров
У @pafederwitz и у меня есть коллега, которому нужно импортировать свои интерлинеаризованные данные из Adapt It в ... , если меня направят в нужном направлении. anon766047 Veith
anon766047 152 задал вопрос фев 9, 2021
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.
Matthew 16:18
3,060 вопросов
6,021 ответов
5,689 комментариев
2,035 пользователей