我目前正在處理詞彙表（Wordlist），為了確保我使用的是最新版本，我剛安裝了 Paratext 9.2。
- 在詞彙表形態欄位中，關於 ‹Aezek›（這是 Isaac 的音譯）有兩個出現記錄如下：
‘/aezek/ ; /Aezek/’。
如果我點擊它，會出現訊息：‘具有多重解析的詞彙，其形態只能在專案逐字對照表（Project Interlinearizer）中編輯。’
但我如何在逐字對照表中找到這個有問題的 lowercase ‘aezek’？在翻譯文本中，它始終是大寫的。
- 在翻譯文本和詞彙表中，‘Aezek’ 也正確地以 ‘Aezék’ 的形式出現，帶有聲調符號。（像這樣的詞是否帶有聲調符號，取決於它在子句中的位置以及它所關聯的動詞形式。）
現在，在 ‹Aezék› 的形態欄位中，列出了兩個出現記錄如下：
‘Aezék/ ; /Aezek/’。
如果我點擊它，會得到與上述相同的訊息。由於文本中只有兩個 ‹Aezék› 的出現（帶有此聲調符號），我在逐字對照表中查看了它們，並確保兩者的詞彙解析都是 ‹Aezek›（沒有聲調符號），但詞彙表仍然抱怨 ‹aezék› 有多重解析，並且這只能在逐字對照表中編輯。
- 我也不太確定在詞彙表形態欄位中，我通常應該如何處理我們的聲調符號。似乎我可以在形態欄位中刪除任何聲調符號而不會有任何問題，而且由於單獨的聲調本身不承載功能/意義，這對我來說似乎是更可取的。如果我在全程這樣做，未來會不會有任何問題？
在翻譯文本中，我們也正確地有，例如，‹Aezaya-qa› 和 ‹Aezaya-qá›（‘Isaiah’s’），因此在詞彙表中有兩個條目，這也是正確的。
現在發生了一件有趣的事情：當我刪除第二個條目（‹Aezaya-qá›）形態欄位中的聲調符號時，我在第 2 點中描述的 ‹Aezék› 的問題突然消失了！現在形態中只列出了 ‹Aezek›。
我想知道這是否是一個錯誤。
- 似乎逐字對照表中還有另一個錯誤。每次我按下 Ctrl+S 保存時，逐字對照表就會消失。
如果您對這些問題中的任何一個有任何見解，我非常希望能聽到您的意見。
謝謝
rfkvg
I’m currently working on the Wordlist, and to make sure I’m up to date I just installed Paratext 9.2.
- In the Wordlist Morphology field for ‹Aezek› (which is the transliteration for Isaac) two occurrences are listed as follows:
‘/aezek/ ; /Aezek/’.
If I click on it, I get the message ‘The morphology for words with multiple parses can be edited only in the Project Interlinearizer.’
But how can I find this offending lowercase ‘aezek’ in the Interlinearizer? In the translated text it is always uppercase.
- In the translated text and in the Wordlist ‘Aezek’ also occurs correctly as ‘Aezék’, with a tone mark. (Whether a word like that carries a tone mark or not depends on its position in the clause and the form of the verb that it relates to.)
Now in the Morphology column for ‹Aezék› two occurrences are listed as follows:
‘Aezék/ ; /Aezek/’.
If I click on it I get the same message as above. Since there are only two occurrences of ‹Aezék› in the text (with this tone mark) I looked at them in the Interlinearizer and made sure that the word parse for both of them is ‹Aezek› (without a tone mark), but the Wordlist still complained that ‹aezék› had multiple parses and that this could only be edited in the Interlinearizer.
- I’m also not quite sure what I should do with our tone marks in general in the Wordlist Morphology fields. It seems that I can delete any tone marks in the Morphology fields without any problems, and since an individual tone on its own doesn’t carry a function/meaning, this seems to me preferable. Might there be any problem in the future if I did that throughout?
In the translated text we also correctly have, for example, ‹Aezaya-qa› and ‹Aezaya-qá› (‘Isaiah’s’) and thus two entries in the Wordlist, which is correct too.
Now something interesting happened: When I deleted the tone mark in the Morphology field of the second entry (‹Aezaya-qá›), the problem in ‹Aezék› I described in point 2 suddenly disappeared! Now only ‹Aezek› is listed in the Morphology.
I wonder if that’s a bug.
- It seems there’s also another bug in the Interlinearizer. Whenever I press Ctrl+S to save it, the Interlinearizer disappears.
If you have any insight about any of these points I would love to hear from you.
Thanks
rfkvg
機器翻譯自 English
