我目前正在处理词表（Wordlist），为了确保自己是最新版本，我刚安装了 Paratext 9.2。
- 在词表（Wordlist）中，针对 ‹Aezek›（这是 Isaac 的音译）的形态（Morphology）字段，列出了两个出现实例，如下所示：
‘/aezek/ ; /Aezek/’。
如果我点击它，会收到一条消息：“具有多种解析（parses）的词的形态只能在项目逐词对照（Project Interlinearizer）中编辑。”
但我如何在逐词对照（Interlinearizer）中找到这个有问题的全小写 ‘aezek’？在翻译文本中，它始终是大写的。
- 在翻译文本和词表（Wordlist）中，‘Aezek’ 也正确地以 ‘Aezék’ 的形式出现，带有声调符号。（像这样的词是否带有声调符号，取决于它在从句中的位置以及它所关联的动词形式。）
现在，在 ‹Aezék› 的形态（Morphology）列中，列出了两个出现实例，如下所示：
‘Aezék/ ; /Aezek/’。
如果我点击它，会得到与上面相同的消息。由于文本中只有两个 ‹Aezék› 的出现实例（带有此声调符号），我在逐词对照（Interlinearizer）中查看了它们，并确保这两个词的解析（word parse）都是 ‹Aezek›（不带声调符号），但词表（Wordlist）仍然抱怨 ‹aezék› 有多种解析，并且这只能在逐词对照（Interlinearizer）中编辑。
- 我也不太确定在词表（Wordlist）的形态（Morphology）字段中，我通常应该如何处理我们的声调符号。似乎我可以在形态（Morphology）字段中删除任何声调符号而不会有任何问题，而且由于单独的声调本身不携带功能/含义，这在我看来是更可取的。如果我这样做，将来会不会有任何问题？
在翻译文本中，我们也正确地有，例如，‹Aezaya-qa› 和 ‹Aezaya-qá›（“Isaiah 的”），因此在词表（Wordlist）中有两个条目，这也是正确的。
现在发生了一件有趣的事情：当我删除第二个条目（‹Aezaya-qá›）形态（Morphology）字段中的声调符号时，我在第 2 点中描述的 ‹Aezék› 的问题突然消失了！现在形态（Morphology）中只列出了 ‹Aezek›。
我想知道这是否是一个 Bug。
- 似乎逐词对照（Interlinearizer）中还有另一个 Bug。每当我按下 Ctrl+S 保存时，逐词对照（Interlinearizer）窗口就会消失。
如果您对这些中的任何一点有任何见解，我很乐意听到您的意见。
谢谢
rfkvg
I’m currently working on the Wordlist, and to make sure I’m up to date I just installed Paratext 9.2.
- In the Wordlist Morphology field for ‹Aezek› (which is the transliteration for Isaac) two occurrences are listed as follows:
‘/aezek/ ; /Aezek/’.
If I click on it, I get the message ‘The morphology for words with multiple parses can be edited only in the Project Interlinearizer.’
But how can I find this offending lowercase ‘aezek’ in the Interlinearizer? In the translated text it is always uppercase.
- In the translated text and in the Wordlist ‘Aezek’ also occurs correctly as ‘Aezék’, with a tone mark. (Whether a word like that carries a tone mark or not depends on its position in the clause and the form of the verb that it relates to.)
Now in the Morphology column for ‹Aezék› two occurrences are listed as follows:
‘Aezék/ ; /Aezek/’.
If I click on it I get the same message as above. Since there are only two occurrences of ‹Aezék› in the text (with this tone mark) I looked at them in the Interlinearizer and made sure that the word parse for both of them is ‹Aezek› (without a tone mark), but the Wordlist still complained that ‹aezék› had multiple parses and that this could only be edited in the Interlinearizer.
- I’m also not quite sure what I should do with our tone marks in general in the Wordlist Morphology fields. It seems that I can delete any tone marks in the Morphology fields without any problems, and since an individual tone on its own doesn’t carry a function/meaning, this seems to me preferable. Might there be any problem in the future if I did that throughout?
In the translated text we also correctly have, for example, ‹Aezaya-qa› and ‹Aezaya-qá› (‘Isaiah’s’) and thus two entries in the Wordlist, which is correct too.
Now something interesting happened: When I deleted the tone mark in the Morphology field of the second entry (‹Aezaya-qá›), the problem in ‹Aezék› I described in point 2 suddenly disappeared! Now only ‹Aezek› is listed in the Morphology.
I wonder if that’s a bug.
- It seems there’s also another bug in the Interlinearizer. Whenever I press Ctrl+S to save it, the Interlinearizer disappears.
If you have any insight about any of these points I would love to hear from you.
Thanks
rfkvg
机器翻译自 English
