0 votes

Continuing the discussion from PT regex flavour and scope:

Would anyone like me to submit this as a feature request?

Paratext by (1.4k points)

3 Answers

0 votes
Best answer

One reason for keeping this is that it gives a history of what you “tried” to change. Also, if any edits had been made to the text those will be reflected in the history point. In my example I had not made any additional changes before doing the Find/Replace so it doesn’t show any changes.

Often I’ll do a Find before doing a Find/Replace so that I can check to see if the item even exists.

33

by (8.4k points)

… which is what I would do.

And this is exactly my point: if users were disciplined enough to do a Find first, then there would be no “unnecessary” points marked; but since many of our users seem to just go ahead and use Replace, our History is littered with these “attempts at Replace”.

Either way, I can’t really see why you would want to know what you tried to change …

0 votes

Yes. That looks like a good idea. Seems little to lose.

by (502 points)
0 votes

agreed

by (1.2k points)
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
How good and pleasant it is when God’s people live together in unity!
Psalm 133:1
2,626 questions
5,362 answers
5,041 comments
1,420 users