0 votes

Continuing the discussion from PT regex flavour and scope:

Would anyone like me to submit this as a feature request?

Paratext by (1.4k points)

3 Answers

0 votes
Best answer

One reason for keeping this is that it gives a history of what you “tried” to change. Also, if any edits had been made to the text those will be reflected in the history point. In my example I had not made any additional changes before doing the Find/Replace so it doesn’t show any changes.

Often I’ll do a Find before doing a Find/Replace so that I can check to see if the item even exists.

33

by (8.0k points)

… which is what I would do.

And this is exactly my point: if users were disciplined enough to do a Find first, then there would be no “unnecessary” points marked; but since many of our users seem to just go ahead and use Replace, our History is littered with these “attempts at Replace”.

Either way, I can’t really see why you would want to know what you tried to change …

0 votes

Yes. That looks like a good idea. Seems little to lose.

by (492 points)
0 votes

agreed

by (1.2k points)
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
I urge you, brothers and sisters, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them.
Romans 16:17
2,475 questions
5,169 answers
4,863 comments
1,278 users