0
535 次浏览

Our team would like to add cross references which refer to the same book without stating the book name.

E.g. inside the book of Matthew, to have a footnote saying something like "for more information on this topic also see \xt 2:34\xt* "

I can’t get this to work and still pass the reference checks. Of course we could simply leave those as unmarked (no \xt marker), but then we would lose the ability to quickly check if the reference is the correct one, and we would lose the ability to hot-link the references in future digital publications.

Is there any way to set up the Scripture Reference Settings so that a reference with no book name means “the current book”?

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
Paratext (1.9k 分) 发布
已重新显示 | 535 次浏览

1 个回答

0
最佳答案

It should work to just have the chapter and verse referring to the current book. I just tried it in a test project and it works fine for me.
What is the error message you are getting?

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
[Expert]
(16.7k 分) 发布

anon848905, thanks for the hack which looks like it might fit our purposes to some extent, though they obviously wouldn’t let us click the link and check the attached passage.

anon291708, in your test project did you just have a reference like \xt 2:34\xt*? I know you can type out the book name if it’s self-referential, but we’re trying to have xrefs that don’t include a book name at all.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示

Yes, I tried it directly in the text and in a cross reference. See 1KI 10:26 in my screenshot (I know this is 9.0, but it should act the same in 8.0):

That’s why I was wondering what error message you got. Maybe the error message is unrelated to not having a book specified.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示

Arrrgh. You’re completely right.

The problem was the reference was typed in our old format, and so was failing the test. So if you just have chapter:verse (formatted correctly :smile:) and no book name, it works exactly the way I had hoped.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示

Yes, I have seen several projects with cross-references internal to books and was wondering what has “broken” to keep this from working. I do know of one project that used the book name “Kap” for all cross references in the same book, but they could not pass the Scripture reference checks either.

By the way, the \ior…\ior* and \xt…\xt* markers are routinely used in book introductions and pass the Scripture reference checks. If this ever stops work, please report the bug.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示

And that is why anon291708 is so valuable! He knows things - and asks good questions. Thanks anon291708! I will retract my previous suggestion so as not to confuse the issue.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示

相关问题

+1
1 个回答 252 次浏览
如果这个问题已经被问过/讨论过,或者在某个手册里有说明,请见谅! 我想知道是否有办法检查我们的交叉引用是否按顺序列出了圣经书卷,并且格式是否正确 例如,捕捉到以下错误: 诗篇 132:11;撒母耳记下 ... 路加福音 3:2, 12;4:8) 我已经运行了引用的基本检查(Basic Checks),但这些错误没有被捕捉到 谢谢, anon953007
anon953007 213 发布 提问于 一月 25, 2021
0
1 个回答 33 次浏览
我们在交叉引用关键词/引文或脚注文本中有很多地方使用了 \+nd Here\+nd* 标记检查(在 运行基本检查 中)将这些标记为 此处不能出现标记 示例: \v 4 \f + \fr 6:4 \ft Die bronteks merk ... 我已经拒绝了这些错误,但 DBL 上传检查仍然失败 在交叉引用和脚注中正确设置这些样式的正确方法是什么?
gregbac 141 发布 提问于 一月 19
0
1 个回答 97 次浏览
由于 USFM 文档中缺乏相关细节,且我无法在此找到答案, 请问您能否澄清以下情况的正确语法: - Our Esther Greek uses many publisher verses (\vp) ... -6257-43be-a2b8-dbf3a2359a4a%2D%2D%3E-->|ESG 10:13\xta \+it k\+it*\x*
gregbac 141 发布 提问于 一月 9
0
1 个回答 230 次浏览
在我们的一个项目中,我们在完成初稿并检查后,使用 Paratext 中的插入交叉引用工具插入了脚注。这导致交叉引用出现在节的开头,而不是末尾。有没有人有一个稳健的正则表达式,可以将交叉引用移到节的末尾?
anon251522 150 发布 提问于 六月 7, 2023
0
1 个回答 328 次浏览
有没有办法将交叉引用与参考文本进行核对?虽然有用于比较脚注、章节标题、引用等内容的检查清单,可以跨多个译本进行比较,但我找不到任何方法对交叉引用(由 \x 标记集标记)进行同样的操作。这可行吗? anon380150
anon380150 242 发布 提问于 十月 3, 2022
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
For just as each of us has one body with many members, and these members do not all have the same function, so in Christ we, though many, form one body, and each member belongs to all the others.
Romans 12:4-5
3,048 个问题
6,007 个回答
5,672 条评论
2,028 位用户