0
365 次浏览

Hello,

I am writing as a representative of a small task team assigned to review proposals for what becomes a formal update to USFM and USX (3.0). The current documentation for the 3.0 proposal includes a mix of new markup proposals, changes / corrections to the definitions for marker validity (i.e. the usfm.sty stylesheet rules, and USX schema), and proposals for deprecating some existing markup.

Two of the more notable additions are 1) a proposed syntax for adding descriptive attributes to words (character level markers) in USFM / USX and 2) a proposed syntax for defining linking in USFM / USX.

The 3.0 proposal is an attempt to summarize collected input from users, and to provide standard solutions in USFM and USX for various archiving and publication needs (especially in light of digital).

It would be helpful at this time to have a somewhat larger body of interested people review the current documentation, and comment. Input might come from users or tool developers. This will help to ensure that important needs are not missed or inadequately addressed - but is not intending to imply that all new requests would be immediately included in USFM / USX 3.0 (there’s always 3.1!)

If you would like to engage in reviewing / commenting on the current proposal documentation, please contact me directly off-list, and I will be able to share the necessary information with you.

Thank you.

jmkla
[Email Removed]

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
Paratext [Expert]
(290 分) 发布
| 365 次浏览

2 个回答

0
最佳答案

Is there a way that any of us can suggest additions to USFM? For example, I had a couple of ideas recently …

One is a marker to quote text literally – text that would otherwise be interpreted as a marker or special character (e.g. when you want a project to contain the text “http://…”) – see my brief discussion of it here: Guide: File > Print Draft .

Another would be a clause-divider marker: in the language I work in, we often have long sentences with no commas. In a SAB-built* app with text highlighting at a phrase level during audio playback, it would be nice to be able to divide a long sentence into two or three with a marker that aeneas would treat as punctuation. Though I guess we could use a hidden space, and tell aeneas that this is a punctuation character; or, if we wanted a visible character, we could use, say, a hash (#), and then have PrintDraftChanges.txt remove hashes at publication time.

But if we had a marker for this, we might also have a marker for no-clause-divide: our language also sometimes has sentences with far too many commas, and that looks silly when an SAB app reads the text. With this marker, you could mark a comma or other punctuation mark so that it is ignored by aeneas.

* Scripture App Builder
aeneas is a program that automatically calculates the timings of the punctuation marks that you select. It was developed for use with SAB. The same markers I’m suggesting could also be used by teams that mark the timings manually: in this case the punctuation marks (and, in my suggestion, also markers) divide up the script that SAB outputs, and which aids the person listening to the audio.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
(1.4k 分) 发布
已重新显示

wdavidhj, (others)

You can engage with the USFM issues backlog in Github, here:

The current open issues / comments / ideas are here: https://github.com/ubsicap/usfm/issues

The items intended in 3.0.0 are here: https://github.com/ubsicap/usfm/milestone/2
(there are some open items, some of which relate to need for adjustments to documentation or stylesheets; a few new items yet).

3.0.0 support in Paratext will not happen officially until PT 8.1. Some items in USFM 3 will require more and less support from the editor – and it may not all receive a final polished treatment, but will work with checking tools. Items such as Ruby support for CJK texts will have some substantial UI / editor support in Paratext.

The documentation is built from this repository, and the current version can be found at.
https://ubsicap.github.io/usfm/

jmkla

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
0

I see that Paratext 8.0.83.1 still comes with USFM 2.502. Is that still the latest approved USFM standard? Is USFM 3.0.0 still just a proposal?

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
(346 分) 发布

相关问题

+5
1 个回答 251 次浏览
Hello, I am looking for an offline version of USFM 3.0. Is there anyway to get a PDF version of USFM 3.0 that is found ... to make 3.0 available in PDF as well? Cheers - pbtpng.it
pbtpng.it 142 发布 提问于 五月 13, 2019
0
2 个回答 47 次浏览
我需要将一个 USX 文件转换为 USFM。我看到 Paratext 有反向操作的选项,但没看到从 USX 到 USFM 的选项。我需要这样做,因为 Proskomma(用于 Scripture App Builder 构建 PWA)拒绝了圣经中的 12 卷书,原因是它们不符合标准格式。我希望将它们转换为 USFM 后,Proskomma 处理起来会更轻松。
yeti 109 发布 提问于 三月 19
+1
6 个回答 820 次浏览
有没有人知道可以将 USFM 格式转换为 USX(或其他任何 xml 变体)的命令行工具? 我想写一个脚本来从不同项目中获取几个不同的 .sfm 文件并批量转换它们 使用内置的 Tools->Advanced->Export Project ... usfm2usfx.exe 工具,但无法使其工作,但如果人们说那是最佳选择,我可以尝试弄清楚哪里出了问题
mnjames 1.9k 发布 提问于 八月 30, 2018
0
2 个回答 236 次浏览
In the USX export file from Paratext, for certain references, the transformation adds an extra - in the tag. ... bug in the USX transformation. Any help would be appreciated.
anon753074 109 发布 提问于 四月 24, 2020
0
1 个回答 249 次浏览
We very much appreciate the way PT8 manges hyphenation data. I might have mentioned that our entire language project ( ... can be. So please lift the one-character-limitation.
Tim 934 发布 提问于 三月 5, 2019
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.
1 John 1:7
3,047 个问题
6,007 个回答
5,671 条评论
2,027 位用户