0 suara
496 tampilan

I have (cross reference) notes with more than one “origin reference” \xo, one referring to one verse, another referring to a range of verses. Here is an example:

\x * \xo 7.16‑17 \xt Mt 12.33, 35 \xo 7.16 \xq ἀπὸ … αὐτούς \xt Sir 27.6 \xq μήτι … σῦκα \xt Jas 3.12\x*

With basic checks I now get the following error:

MAT 7:16 Missing or invalid punctuation before \xo: Mt 12.33, 35

Is there a place in the Scripture reference settings to get rid of these errors?

The USFM documentation does not mention more than one \xo (allowing or forbidding). Splitting the references up into two notes would be possible, but I find it not very elegant to have two reference notes directly one after another.

Postingan lama - ditampilkan dalam bahasa aslinya
Paratext oleh (872 poin) | 496 tampilan

1 Jawaban

0 suara
Jawaban terbaik

For multiple \xo markers to appear in a single cross reference, they must be separated by a major reference divider (i.e. either a Book Sequence separator or Chapter Sequence separator), or by Final Punctuation if Final punctuation must end each \xt section in all cross references is checked in the Scripture Reference Settings.

So the following should work (note the semicolon before the second \xo):

\x * \xo 7.16‑17 \xt Mt 12.33, 35; \xo 7.16 \xq ἀπὸ … αὐτούς \xt Sir 27.6 \xq μήτι … σῦκα \xt Jas 3.1`2\x*

Postingan lama - ditampilkan dalam bahasa aslinya
oleh [Expert]
(16,7k poin)

ditampilkan kembali

Pertanyaan terkait

0 suara
2 jawaban 635 tampilan
I hope that title was descriptive enough. Our project has a few keywords that contain USFM markers for example \w \+nd God\ ... markup so that it can find them in the GLO? Thanks!
anon469793 155 bertanya Nov 13, 2019
+2 suara
1 jawaban 28 tampilan
Tim Pengembangan Paratext yang terhormat, Saya ingin melaporkan masalah terkait Run Basic Checks, khususnya kesalahan berikut ... banyak atas dukungan Anda. Hormat kami, Prabhu
Prabhu_beelagi 241 bertanya Mar 25
0 suara
3 jawaban 488 tampilan
It used to be the case that the xo marker was optional in cross references, but now PT 8.0.100 Basic Checks References ... there a way to tell PT not to demand the xo marker?
Seppo Sipilä 250 bertanya Sep 20, 2018
+1 suara
1 jawaban 74 tampilan
Halo, Terima kasih kepada para pengembang PT atas semua kerja luar biasa Anda! Saya seorang ahli bahasa, fasilitator ... hanya ingin berbagi umpan balik ini. Terima kasih banyak!
alex_larkin 379 bertanya Jul 21
0 suara
1 jawaban 27 tampilan
Saya perhatikan bahwa banyak kesalahan spasi, seperti ||[U+0020]||, muncul selama pengecekan dasar, meskipun ... setiap kesalahan satu per satu? Terima kasih atas bimbingannya.
Shivaji 117 bertanya Mar 19
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
And over all these virtues put on love, which binds them all together in perfect unity.
Colossians 3:14
3,051 pertanyaan
6,010 jawaban
5,676 komentar
2,030 pengguna