0 votos
495 vistas

I have (cross reference) notes with more than one “origin reference” \xo, one referring to one verse, another referring to a range of verses. Here is an example:

\x * \xo 7.16‑17 \xt Mt 12.33, 35 \xo 7.16 \xq ἀπὸ … αὐτούς \xt Sir 27.6 \xq μήτι … σῦκα \xt Jas 3.12\x*

With basic checks I now get the following error:

MAT 7:16 Missing or invalid punctuation before \xo: Mt 12.33, 35

Is there a place in the Scripture reference settings to get rid of these errors?

The USFM documentation does not mention more than one \xo (allowing or forbidding). Splitting the references up into two notes would be possible, but I find it not very elegant to have two reference notes directly one after another.

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
Paratext por (872 puntos) | 495 vistas

1 Respuesta

0 votos
Mejor respuesta

For multiple \xo markers to appear in a single cross reference, they must be separated by a major reference divider (i.e. either a Book Sequence separator or Chapter Sequence separator), or by Final Punctuation if Final punctuation must end each \xt section in all cross references is checked in the Scripture Reference Settings.

So the following should work (note the semicolon before the second \xo):

\x * \xo 7.16‑17 \xt Mt 12.33, 35; \xo 7.16 \xq ἀπὸ … αὐτούς \xt Sir 27.6 \xq μήτι … σῦκα \xt Jas 3.1`2\x*

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
por [Expert]
(16,7k puntos)

mostrada de nuevo

Preguntas relacionadas

0 votos
2 respuestas 635 vistas
I hope that title was descriptive enough. Our project has a few keywords that contain USFM markers for example \w \+nd God\ ... markup so that it can find them in the GLO? Thanks!
anon469793 155 preguntada nov 13, 2019
+2 votos
1 respuesta 28 vistas
Estimado equipo de desarrollo de Paratext: Me gustaría reportar un problema relacionado con Run Basic Checks, ... Muchas gracias por su apoyo. Saludos cordiales, Prabhu
Prabhu_beelagi 241 preguntada mar 25
0 votos
3 respuestas 488 vistas
It used to be the case that the xo marker was optional in cross references, but now PT 8.0.100 Basic Checks References ... there a way to tell PT not to demand the xo marker?
Seppo Sipilä 250 preguntada sep 20, 2018
+1 voto
1 respuesta 74 vistas
Hola, Gracias a los desarrolladores de PT por todo su increíble trabajo! Soy lingüista, facilitador de traducción ... modos solo quería compartir el comentario. Muchas gracias!
alex_larkin 379 preguntada jul 21
0 votos
1 respuesta 27 vistas
He notado que aparecen muchos errores de espacios en blanco, como ||[U+0020]||, durante las comprobaciones ... que rechazar cada uno individualmente? Gracias por su orientación.
Shivaji 117 preguntada mar 19
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.
1 John 1:7
3,051 preguntas
6,010 respuestas
5,676 comentarios
2,030 usuarios