0
596 次瀏覽

The instructions for 7.6β say:

You must ensure that the other members of the project team have upgraded
Paratext before you opt-in these features on the shared project.
Upgrade options are:
Upgrade team members to 7.5.100.46 or later.

    Team members will be unable to use Project Interlinearizer, Word

List, and Guess Translations, but can do other work. -or-Upgrade team members to the 7.6 Beta Test Version.

    Team members will need setup and training, will be more at risk 

of unexpected problems, and you will need to support them.

We have a lot of observers on our project, and none of them are in the same geographical location. I also have no way of knowing what version they currently have, apart from emailing them (and then, for some of them, emailing them again and again before I get an answer).

Or is it OK for users in an Observer role to have PT <7.5.100.46, since they can’t edit the text?

The feature where PT 7.6β2 flags out of date copies of PT in the summary it gives after an S/R is really nice … but it would be even nicer if it could tell you the PT version of all the users (the version they had the last time they S/R’ed). Then I could tell the relevant users to upgrade and do an S/R, and I’d know for sure that they really were on the latest version.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
Paratext (1.4k 點) 提出 | 596 次瀏覽

2 個回答

0
最佳回答

People who do not upgrade to 7.5.100.46 or later will be unable to open the project at all whether they are an observer or not. You can use the project without enabling the new 7.6 features and the project will continue to be able to be opened by previous versions of Paratext.

There is a way (more of a workaround :neutral_face:) to see the versions of all users on your projects in 7.6 by opening Project > Recent Changes and selecting a date that is far in the past.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
[Expert]
(16.7k 點) 提出

Looks like I was being too pessimistic: I thought that there was a danger that users of the old version would corrupt the project (I think there was a PT upgrade once that was dangerous like that). Thank you for giving more detail than the beta instructions did!

Nice hack. Though it’s not going to catch those observers, who never make changes to the project :unamused:.

The beta help also says:

After the team member computers are upgraded per either option above:
I. You opt-in on the project, and complete the Send/Receive that is initiated.
But don’t use the new features yet.
II. Then have all team members Send/Receive the project.
III. Then you may use the multi-parse and infix features.

We have 27 project members, of whom only 7 are currently in our office. I really don’t know how I’m going to determine when everyone has done an S/R. The instructions also don’t tell me what would happen if I use the new features when one user still has not done an S/R.

I’d love a feature in PT that says: “Inform Administrator when everyone has done an S/R”!

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
0

I’m still looking for an answer to this. It’s hard for me to force our ten Observers to upgrade in a timely manner. Some of them are occasional users; some go on extended leave and don’t read the emails I send them; etc.

If, after I opt-in, an Observer with PT <7.5.100.46 tried to open the project, they will presumably not be prevented from doing so, since their old version of PT will be unaware of the new feature. Will they mess up the SFM files as a result? Or does the fact that they can’t edit the text protect the files from corruption. That’s the key question!

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
(1.4k 點) 提出

If the user has a version before 7.5.100.46 (or maybe a little before this,
we did several changes related to accessing 7.6 versions in 7.4 and 7.5),
they will get a message saying that the project can’t be opened and it will
not be in the list of available projects that they can view.

The final out come was that 7.5 users will be able to open a 7.6 version
project (the version after opt-in is done), but will not be able to open
interlinear related forms since 7.5 doesn’t support the new format.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示

相關問題

+1
3 個回答 499 次瀏覽
我們有一位使用者希望在 Paratext 專案中以筆名工作 管理員也希望讓該使用者無法看到翻譯團隊的其他成員 目前,我們建議他們使用輔助專案(Auxiliary project),讓該筆名使用者成為專案中唯一的使用者 我建議他們只處理其他成員已完 ... 能具備追蹤父專案變更的能力(類似於回譯狀態核取方塊),但不確定這在這種情境下是否是最好的建議 謝謝,
[Moderator]
james_post
2.1k 提出
已提問 11月 12, 2021
0
2 個回答 350 次瀏覽
I have a colleague who is being frustrated with the English interlinearizing of the Greet NT source text in Paratext ... copyright restrictions. But I thought it was worth asking.
anon703820 222 提出 已提問 1月 31, 2018
0
2 個回答 436 次瀏覽
A user accidentally put about 120 MB of pictures into his figures folder, and Paratext wants to Send/Receive ... Papua New Guinea [Email Removed].pgmailto:[Email Removed].pg
SIL LSS PNG 411 提出 已提問 2月 21, 2017
0
8 個回答 1.4k 次瀏覽
We have a user who has inserted a lot of \pn and some \nd inside of footnotes. We now know we need those to be ... the search to inside of a single footnote? Thank you, MSEAIT/LT
MSEAIT_LT 478 提出 已提問 8月 20, 2018
0
1 個回答 34 次瀏覽
我們在腳註交叉引用中使用 /xt,並設定為使用書卷的「簡稱」。但在術語表中,我想使用書卷名稱的縮寫,請問有沒有其他 USFM 代碼可以做到這一點?
Lenice 180 提出 已提問 10月 7, 2025
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
Live in harmony with one another. Do not be proud, but be willing to associate with people of low position. Do not be conceited.
Romans 12:16
3,045 個問題
6,005 個回答
5,671 則評論
2,026 位使用者