0 votes
66 views
Paratext by (195 points) | 66 views

3 Answers

0 votes
The tools that we use for print (PTXPrint and Publishing Assistant are the main two) allow you to create rules to change markers. So, you could turn off all footnotes in the settings or delete a particular footnote with a rule.
by (9.8k points)
0 votes

Within Paratext, you could use \fe instead of \f for footnotes intended only for digital versions. You could then change all \fe to \f in your digital publication workflow and delete all \fe in your print workflow. Similarly, for \w you could use \wa.

Be sure to document (using a \rem in the FRT book, perhaps) your non-standard uses of these markers so that later users of your text can understand and benefit from your work.

by (607 points)
0 votes

I had similar thoughts to the other two answers here, but have a few additional comments.

1) If you only plan on stopping a few footnotes or glossary entries from being published, then semi-manually deleting at the time of publication is the best option. As @Phil_Leckrone said, many publishing tools include some way of creating "Changes", where you can give it a rule which it applies. This can include rules like "delete a footnote that starts with these certain words" or "delete the glossary entry with this particular term in it".

2) If you think there will be a lot of such footnotes/glossary entries, then it will be worth your time to set up using different markers to differentiate. But unlike what @LivingField said, I wouldn't recommend using a pre-existing maker incorrectly (like \fe). Rather I'd create a new marker in custom.sty which is named something like \zfapp or \zfprint or \z-f-app or the like (I can't remember off the top of my head if - is allowed in a marker name). Starting the name with \z is a great way of warning everyone that "this is a marker we're using in a non-standard way".

Then, when it comes time for print, you can simply set \TextProperties publishable or \TextProperties nonpublishable to get your desired results.

by (1.9k points)

Related questions

0 votes
1 answer 273 views
I am an administrator in this project. Another administrator has made changes in GLO and other books and done send/ ... Project History but have not updated in the GLO book.
anon399461 123 asked Mar 13, 2024
0 votes
2 answers 246 views
I would like to make sure that every verse is approved by at least two members of the team. Previously, we used ... a way to hack the back translation functionality to do this?
bit 495 asked Apr 19, 2022
0 votes
2 answers 114 views
In addition to printing the current version of the vernacular text our team will be reviewing, I want to print the ... but would like to print it without changes indicated. Thanks
Jan Gossner 232 asked Feb 2, 2025
0 votes
1 answer 21 views
We're using /xt in footnote cross-references, set to use 'short name' of book. But in the glossary I'd like to use ... name, is there a different USFM code I could use for that?.
Lenice 180 asked Oct 7, 2025
0 votes
1 answer 238 views
From time to time, I "Mark All Verses in a Chapter as Finished" (usually when I've done a find-replace to ... a straightforward way to get back to a previous state of checkmarks?
viverechristus 296 asked Dec 31, 2024
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
I appeal to you, brothers and sisters, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree with one another in what you say and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly united in mind and thought.
1 Corinthians 1:10
3,037 questions
5,994 answers
5,661 comments
2,022 users