0 votes
102 views

Do there already exist any syntax highlighters for USFM?

These could be in the forms of

  • pattern matchers
  • parsers
  • semantic highlighting
I'd like to know how difficult it'd be to provide this functionality in other USFM editors.
Paratext by (203 points) | 102 views

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Related questions

0 votes
2 answers 772 views
I am trying to create a link to a chapter span like this: \xt 1:16-2:12|MRK 1:16-2:12\xt* But this generates ... -2\xt* But no, it too generated.an Invalid extra material error☐☐
Kent Spielmann 1.8k asked Jul 7, 2022
0 votes
2 answers 457 views
I have a question about \nd name of Deity'. In USFM 2.4 (p. 53) the syntax is: \nd_ \nd* ... ., automatically adding a space following a word within marker boundaries) expected?
Paul 642 asked Sep 17, 2015
0 votes
1 answer 117 views
We're using /xt in footnote cross-references, set to use 'short name' of book. But in the glossary I'd like to use ... name, is there a different USFM code I could use for that?.
Lenice 182 asked Oct 7, 2025
0 votes
2 answers 760 views
For long quotations (both of Scripture from other locations and from external resources), we'd like to set the quote apart ... \ipm or an \imi marker? Is \ipq the equivalent?
mnjames 1.9k asked Mar 1, 2023
0 votes
1 answer 577 views
I am trying to find a non print way of marking passages. So that we can flag the name of the translator and the dialect he speaks. I’m thinking a USFM. Does anyone have any ideas.
anon338354 136 asked Jul 19, 2022
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.
1 John 1:7
3,069 questions
6,030 answers
5,700 comments
2,038 users