0 votes
134 views

Do there already exist any syntax highlighters for USFM?

These could be in the forms of

  • pattern matchers
  • parsers
  • semantic highlighting
I'd like to know how difficult it'd be to provide this functionality in other USFM editors.
Paratext by (203 points) | 134 views

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Related questions

0 votes
2 answers 819 views
I am trying to create a link to a chapter span like this: \xt 1:16-2:12|MRK 1:16-2:12\xt* But this generates ... -2\xt* But no, it too generated.an Invalid extra material error☐☐
Kent Spielmann 1.8k asked Jul 7, 2022
0 votes
2 answers 488 views
I have a question about \nd name of Deity'. In USFM 2.4 (p. 53) the syntax is: \nd_ \nd* ... ., automatically adding a space following a word within marker boundaries) expected?
Paul 647 asked Sep 17, 2015
0 votes
1 answer 181 views
We're using /xt in footnote cross-references, set to use 'short name' of book. But in the glossary I'd like to use ... name, is there a different USFM code I could use for that?.
Lenice 182 asked Oct 7, 2025
0 votes
2 answers 809 views
For long quotations (both of Scripture from other locations and from external resources), we'd like to set the quote apart ... \ipm or an \imi marker? Is \ipq the equivalent?
mnjames 2.0k asked Mar 1, 2023
0 votes
1 answer 633 views
I am trying to find a non print way of marking passages. So that we can flag the name of the translator and the dialect he speaks. I’m thinking a USFM. Does anyone have any ideas.
anon338354 136 asked Jul 19, 2022
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Galatians 3:28
3,082 questions
6,049 answers
5,711 comments
2,048 users