0 votes
36 views

Do there already exist any syntax highlighters for USFM?

These could be in the forms of

  • pattern matchers
  • parsers
  • semantic highlighting
I'd like to know how difficult it'd be to provide this functionality in other USFM editors.
Paratext by (203 points) | 36 views

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Related questions

0 votes
2 answers 414 views
I am trying to create a link to a chapter span like this: \xt 1:16-2:12|MRK 1:16-2:12\xt* But this generates ... -2\xt* But no, it too generated.an Invalid extra material error☐☐
Kent Spielmann 1.8k asked Jul 7, 2022
0 votes
2 answers 285 views
I have a question about \nd name of Deity'. In USFM 2.4 (p. 53) the syntax is: \nd_ \nd* ... ., automatically adding a space following a word within marker boundaries) expected?
Paul 639 asked Sep 17, 2015
0 votes
1 answer 21 views
We're using /xt in footnote cross-references, set to use 'short name' of book. But in the glossary I'd like to use ... name, is there a different USFM code I could use for that?.
Lenice 180 asked Oct 7, 2025
0 votes
2 answers 398 views
For long quotations (both of Scripture from other locations and from external resources), we'd like to set the quote apart ... \ipm or an \imi marker? Is \ipq the equivalent?
mnjames 1.9k asked Mar 1, 2023
0 votes
1 answer 330 views
I am trying to find a non print way of marking passages. So that we can flag the name of the translator and the dialect he speaks. I’m thinking a USFM. Does anyone have any ideas.
anon338354 136 asked Jul 19, 2022
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
For we were all baptized by one Spirit so as to form one body—whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink.
1 Corinthians 12:13
3,037 questions
5,994 answers
5,661 comments
2,022 users