0 votes
46 views

Do there already exist any syntax highlighters for USFM?

These could be in the forms of

  • pattern matchers
  • parsers
  • semantic highlighting
I'd like to know how difficult it'd be to provide this functionality in other USFM editors.
Paratext by (203 points) | 46 views

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Related questions

0 votes
2 answers 442 views
I am trying to create a link to a chapter span like this: \xt 1:16-2:12|MRK 1:16-2:12\xt* But this generates ... -2\xt* But no, it too generated.an Invalid extra material error☐☐
Kent Spielmann 1.8k asked Jul 7, 2022
0 votes
2 answers 299 views
I have a question about \nd name of Deity'. In USFM 2.4 (p. 53) the syntax is: \nd_ \nd* ... ., automatically adding a space following a word within marker boundaries) expected?
Paul 642 asked Sep 17, 2015
0 votes
1 answer 33 views
We're using /xt in footnote cross-references, set to use 'short name' of book. But in the glossary I'd like to use ... name, is there a different USFM code I could use for that?.
Lenice 180 asked Oct 7, 2025
0 votes
2 answers 429 views
For long quotations (both of Scripture from other locations and from external resources), we'd like to set the quote apart ... \ipm or an \imi marker? Is \ipq the equivalent?
mnjames 1.9k asked Mar 1, 2023
0 votes
1 answer 356 views
I am trying to find a non print way of marking passages. So that we can flag the name of the translator and the dialect he speaks. I’m thinking a USFM. Does anyone have any ideas.
anon338354 136 asked Jul 19, 2022
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
For just as each of us has one body with many members, and these members do not all have the same function, so in Christ we, though many, form one body, and each member belongs to all the others.
Romans 12:4-5
3,042 questions
6,001 answers
5,666 comments
2,024 users