正如 Phil 所說，沒有簡單的方法來做到這一點。這可能是因為交替指派章節不一定被認為是好的做法。
我想知道交替指派章節背後的考量是什麼。以及您是否已經深思熟慮過您真正想做什麼，或者您是否已經向您的顧問尋求了建議。
您是否考慮過以下幾點？
- 初稿（Drafting）確實需要由一個人為整本書完成，以便呈現統一的「聲音」。如果由不同的人交替進行，將很難保持一致性。
- 檢查（Checks）通常也是針對整本書進行的。因此，修正每個交替章節可能並不輕鬆。雖然我的快速測試顯示 Paratext 似乎可以處理這種情況，但我懷疑這不僅不會減少工作量，反而可能會使工作量加倍。
- 此外，還有許多任務不是基於章節的。
- 翻譯工作通常歷時多年，且團隊成員經常變動。因此，您不希望一次性指派整個新約。我認為這可能是引入 優先順序功能（Priorities feature） 的原因之一。我建議您定義優先順序，然後一次處理一個優先順序的指派和複製指派。
您會很高興地知道，指派與進度選單（Assignments and Progress menu） 上有一個「複製指派（Copy assignments）」功能。一旦您完成了一本書的指派，就可以將它們複製到其他書中。
希望這能幫到您。
As Phil says, there isn't an easy way to do this. Probably because it isn't necessarily considered a good way to do things.
I am interested to know what the thinking is behind assigning alternative chapters. And whether you have thought through what you really want to do, or have you sought advice from your consultant.
Have you considered the following?
- Drafting really needs to be done by one person for the whole book so that it comes out with one "voice". Alternating from one person to another would be hard to keep it consistent.
- Checks are usually run on the whole book as well. So it may not be easy to correct every alternative chapter. Though my quick test shows that Paratext seems to cope with that, but rather than reducing the workload I wonder if it would probably double the workload.
- Then there are all the tasks that are not chapter-based.
- Then a translation is done over many years and often the team members change. So you don't want to do assign the whole New Testament at once. I think that may be one reason the Priorities feature was introduced. I would suggest that you define priorities and then do the assigning and copying assignments one priority at a time.
You will be pleased to know that there is a "Copy assignments" feature on the Assignments and Progress menu. Once you have done the assignments for one book, then you can copy them to other books.
I hope this helps.
機器翻譯自 English
