正如 Phil 所说，没有简单的方法来实现这一点。这可能是因为交替分配章节并不一定被认为是好的做法。
我想知道交替分配章节背后的想法是什么。以及你是否已经仔细考虑过你真正想做什么，或者你是否已经向你的顾问寻求过建议。
你是否考虑过以下几点？
- 初稿（Drafting）最好由一个人完成整卷书，这样译本才能保持统一的“声音”。如果由不同的人交替翻译，很难保持一致性。
- 检查（Checks）通常也是针对整卷书运行的。因此，纠正每个交替章节可能并不容易。虽然我的快速测试表明 Paratext 似乎可以处理这种情况，但我怀疑这非但不会减少工作量，反而可能会使工作量加倍。
- 此外，还有许多任务不是基于章节的。
- 翻译工作往往持续多年，团队成员也经常变动。因此，你不想一次性分配整个新约。我认为这可能是引入 优先级功能（Priorities feature） 的原因之一。我建议你先定义优先级，然后一次处理一个优先级，进行分配和复制分配。
很高兴地告诉你，分配与进度菜单（Assignments and Progress menu） 上有一个“复制分配（Copy assignments）”功能。一旦你完成了一卷书的分配，就可以将它们复制到其他卷书中。
希望这能帮到你。
As Phil says, there isn't an easy way to do this. Probably because it isn't necessarily considered a good way to do things.
I am interested to know what the thinking is behind assigning alternative chapters. And whether you have thought through what you really want to do, or have you sought advice from your consultant.
Have you considered the following?
- Drafting really needs to be done by one person for the whole book so that it comes out with one "voice". Alternating from one person to another would be hard to keep it consistent.
- Checks are usually run on the whole book as well. So it may not be easy to correct every alternative chapter. Though my quick test shows that Paratext seems to cope with that, but rather than reducing the workload I wonder if it would probably double the workload.
- Then there are all the tasks that are not chapter-based.
- Then a translation is done over many years and often the team members change. So you don't want to do assign the whole New Testament at once. I think that may be one reason the Priorities feature was introduced. I would suggest that you define priorities and then do the assigning and copying assignments one priority at a time.
You will be pleased to know that there is a "Copy assignments" feature on the Assignments and Progress menu. Once you have done the assignments for one book, then you can copy them to other books.
I hope this helps.
机器翻译自 English
