+1 vote
489 vues

Some of us who read messages in our e-mail program rather than on the website. This includes people with limited internet access, but also others (like me), who find it more convenient to receive messages in their Inbox than having to go to the website to see what’s up.
The subject line of each e-mail is [Paratext Supporter site] [Category] topic. This means that most of the topic becomes invisible if the subject line is not wide enough. Here is a screen shot (which I hope is visible):

image

Would it be possible to shorten the subject to e.g. [PT Supporters]… or [PT site]…? (Also, I wouldn’t mind if the category were left out, but others may like to have it included.) It’s just a small detail, but then, it may be easy to fix.

Paulus+Kieviet

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine
Paratext par (517 points) | 489 vues

1 Réponse

0 votes
Meilleure réponse

I think I’ve changed the subject line of e-mails to be “[PT Supporters] {topic} [Category]”. Let me know if this is not working.

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine
par [Expert]
(16,7k points)

réaffiché

Just noticed your message, but yes, I noticed that the subject line is now clearer. Thank you!

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine

I have noticed that most messages I receive in my Outlook email client from this list with “RE: [PT Supporters]” in the Subject line have the “You are encouraged to post this and future questions at https://support.paratext.org*** https://support.paratext.org” heading and the message content as an attachment. But those with “[PT Supporters]” only, have the message content correctly formatted in HTML. Is it only if responses are written on the webpage that email recipients will receive them in HTML format?

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine

This may have confused things, but there are now two lists that use [PT Supporters] in the subject line.

The ones that say “You are encouraged to post…” are actually going through the older [Email Removed] system.

Is it possible to post a new question by email? explains how to post questions via email on the PT Supporters Site.

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine

I see that the newest list has now changed the label in the subject line to [PT Support Site]. The old list still uses the label [PT Supporters].

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine

… and the old prefix was [Paratext Supporter Site] – no “s” on “Supporter” – I’m being picky regarding @anon848905’s comment:

… and also thinking that someone might want to know the exact name in order to search their Inbox.

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine

Questions connexes

0 votes
0 réponses 169 vues
I receive an e-mail whenever something changes in one of the many projects that I'm associated with. I would rather ... or would it be possible to offer these options? Thank you
nomadic consultant 169 posée févr. 3, 2018
0 votes
3 réponses 383 vues
Puis-je personnaliser l'interligne de mon projet de rétro-tradition ?
Michel 125 posée nov. 4, 2023
0 votes
2 réponses 442 vues
J'ai pensé que je devrais ouvrir un nouveau sujet sur ce point plutôt que de continuer la discussion dans un autre fil. ... une, y compris les versets) Avez-vous d'autres idées ?
anon928451 127 posée févr. 14, 2023
0 votes
2 réponses 497 vues
D'où proviennent les informations de la ligne parse gloss dans l'interlinéaire ? J'ai commencé à tester une adaptation en ... ? 2022-03-04 11_21_20-Paratext 9.21264 269 13.6 KB
anon297911 424 posée mars 4, 2022
0 votes
1 réponse 357 vues
Hier, en ouvrant Paratext 9.1, un utilisateur a reçu le message d'avertissement suivant : Le projet Ban sur votre ... ouverture de Paratext. Comment puis-je m'en débarrasser ?
n8_in_car 298 posée nov. 17, 2021
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of their possessions was their own, but they shared everything they had.
Acts 4:32
3,060 questions
6,021 réponses
5,687 commentaires
2,035 utilisateurs