0 votos
656 vistas

It seems my current versions of PT8 and PT9 on Linux are not compatible with the new PT Live server. First of all, is there a way to reliably compare a Linux PT package version with an equivalent Windows PT patch version? The announcement page for the new PT Live server (https://paratext.org/2019/12/10/new-paratext-live-server/) says:

Paratext 8 must use 8.0.100.87 or newer and Paratext 9 must use 9.0.100.5 or newer

My current Linux PT versions are:

$ dpkg -l | grep -E ‘paratext-[0-9]’
ii paratext-8.0 1.47 amd64 input, edit, check, and publish Scripture translations
ii paratext-9.0 0.37 amd64 input, edit, check, and publish Scripture translations

It’s only through experimentation with someone using PT8 in Windows that I discovered that I could not access the same PT Live server as him. So, in summary, here are my two questions:

  1. Is there a way to reliably compare a Linux PT package version with an equivalent Windows PT patch version?
  2. Is there a known roadmap for when the Linux versions will be compatible with the newer PT Live server?
Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
Paratext por (298 puntos)
mostrada de nuevo | 656 vistas

6 Respuestas

0 votos
Mejor respuesta

I verified that the latest bionic paratext versions connect to the new Paratext Live server.

paratext-8.0 1.48
paratext-9.0 0.40

These were in the packages.sil.org experimental repo.

paratext-8.0 1.47, paratext-9.0 0.37 are a good bit older.
Linux paratext-8.0 1.47 - corresponds to Windows version 8.0.100.84, which explains why it didn’t work.

I will ensure standard bionic packages.sil.org has the latest build, so hopefully updates for your machine will be available in the next few hours.

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
por [Moderator]
(2,4k puntos)

mostrada de nuevo

Thank you, hindlemail. I’ve been starting to teach colleagues how to
make use of Paratext Live, and it was quite a roadblock when I
realized I couldn’t actually join the same server myself. I got
the updates last night and will be trying them out soon. I
appreciate the work you and any others have done to make PT
available on Ubuntu/Wasta.

n8_in_car

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
0 votos

Hi n8_in_car,

Good point about aligning version numbers. We will discuss that.

The developer will have to look at this issue when he has access to his Linux box, which is in the office, where he cannot get to it right now. He will look into this as soon as this is possible.

Blessings!

Jonathan+Robie

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
por (448 puntos)
mostrada de nuevo
0 votos

Thanks for the reply. I assume there must be more impeding him than simply having access to a system running a Linux OS, since that can be accomplished from nearly anywhere with a laptop, VirtualBox, and an internet connection.
If he would like more information of any kind about my setup, I’m happy to share whatever I can.

n8_in_car

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
por (298 puntos)

I’m pretty sure he knows that. But his development environment and the source code are on that machine.

Jonathan+Robie

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
0 votos

I tried a PT Live session with a colleague yesterday, and I still can’t use the same server as he uses. My window tells me to update to a newer version of PT, and his window tells him that I must update in order to use the server he’s using. This happens whether I use PT 8 or PT 9.

Confirming my PT versions:
$ dpkg -l | grep -E ‘paratext-[0-9]’
ii paratext-8.0 1.53 …
ii paratext-9.0 0.48 …

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
por (298 puntos)
0 votos

Sorry about this.

Linux Paratext needs an update to be compatible with the latest update of the Paratext Live server.

I plan to release new bionic packages tomorrow.

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
por [Moderator]
(2,4k puntos)
0 votos

I’ve uploaded paratext-8.0_1.54 to PSO experimental.

This version should work with the latest Paratext Live server.

It will remain in experimental, until it is further verified.

If you want to try it before it arrives in main/stable PSO then http://packages.sil.org/ has instructions about enabling the experimental repos.

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
por [Moderator]
(2,4k puntos)

mostrada de nuevo

Thank you so much, hindlemail. I’ve already tried it out with a
colleague, and we were successful. This will enable me to better
train others on how to use PT Live.

n8_in_car

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original

Preguntas relacionadas

0 votos
1 respuesta 447 vistas
Tenemos un equipo que ha estado intentando usar Paratext Live en un servidor local y lo está encontrando difícil. Están en ... se corta o está fuera de servicio durante unos días?
MSEAIT_LT 478 preguntada nov 15, 2022
0 votos
5 respuestas 702 vistas
I've got PT9 on my Linux virtual machine. After some time, it has begun to be largely non-functional, with a ... for an update? Meanwhile, I'm continuing with PT8. JohnBrownie
JohnBrownie 385 preguntada feb 3, 2020
0 votos
5 respuestas 616 vistas
I'm transitioning to Linux from Win7 (at its end of support ). I have seen mixed messages about PT9 working in Wasta Linux, ... , what do I need to do to get it to finish loading?
Paul 642 preguntada ene 27, 2020
0 votos
1 respuesta 324 vistas
Estoy intentando configurar una máquina con Windows 11 para que inicie automáticamente un servidor Paratext Live, pero no he ... ? - Ayudas - Sitio de soporte de Paratext Gracias,
MSEAIT_LT 478 preguntada ene 23, 2023
0 votos
0 respuestas 178 vistas
A local dedicated Paratext Live server is a computer that: Is connected to the local area network. Is turned on most ... -should-i-use-a-local-dedicated-paratext-live-server/1174)
[Expert]
anon421222
735
preguntada feb 23, 2017
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
For where two or three gather in my name, there am I with them.
Matthew 18:20
3,045 preguntas
6,005 respuestas
5,671 comentarios
2,026 usuarios