@CrazyRocky 这是那种有趣的讨论,如果你问 10 个人,你会得到 11 个答案。对我来说,一个问题是我们正在混淆头衔和功能。例如,作为排版员,我通常希望拥有管理员的功能,因为我(我个人)需要能够更改设置和调整文本。我意识到并非所有排版员都这样做。
我绝对认为应该将审阅者(Reviewer)的角色分离出来,并赋予其较低的功能(如你所定义的那样)。
话虽如此,我更喜欢直接使用头衔:“Consultant”(顾问)和“Reviewer”(审阅者),并使用你创建的定义。排版员可以被赋予团队和排版员认为适合该情况的任何角色。
因此,最终我们会有五个头衔/功能:
Administrator(管理员)- 添加笔记、编辑文本、更改设置
Translator(翻译)- 添加笔记和编辑文本
Consultant(顾问)- 添加笔记并拥有充当临时管理员的能力
Reviewer(审阅者)- 添加笔记
Observer(观察者)- 仅接收文本更改
在任何给定情况下,档案管理员(Archivist)或排版员(Typesetter)都可以被赋予适合该情况的相应功能(审阅者、顾问或管理员)
@CrazyRocky this is one of those interesting discussions where if you ask 10 people you get 11 answers. For me one issue is that we are mixing titles and functions. For example, as a typesetter I usually want the function of an Administrator because I (me personally) need to be able to make changes to settings and adjust text. I realize that not all typesetters do that.
I definitely think that the role of Reviewer should be separated and given a lesser function (as you have defined).
Having said that, I would prefer to just use the titles: “Consultant” and “Reviewer” with the definitions that you created. Someone who is a typesetter could be given whichever role the team and typesetter deem correct for that situation.
So, in the end we end up with five titles/functions:
Administrator - add notes, edit text, change settings
Translator - add notes and edit text
Consultant - add notes and have ability to act as a temporary administrator
Reviewer - add notes
Observer - only receive changes to the text
In any given context the Archivist or Typesetter can be given the appropriate function for that context (reviewer, consultant, or administrator)
机器翻译自 English