@CrazyRocky 這是那些有趣的討論之一,如果你問 10 個人,你會得到 11 個答案。對我來說,一個問題是我們混淆了頭銜和功能。例如,作為排版員,我通常希望擁有管理員的功能,因為我(個人)需要能夠變更設定並調整文本。我意識到並非所有排版員都這樣做。
我絕對認為審閱者(Reviewer)的角色應該被分離並賦予較少的功能(如您所定義的)。
話雖如此,我傾向於直接使用頭銜:「顧問」(Consultant)和「審閱者」(Reviewer),並使用您創建的定義。作為排版員的人可以被賦予團隊和排版員認為適合該情況的任何角色。
因此,最終我們有五個頭銜/功能:
管理員(Administrator)- 添加註釋、編輯文本、變更設定
翻譯者(Translator)- 添加註釋和編輯文本
顧問(Consultant)- 添加註釋並具有擔任暫時管理員的能力
審閱者(Reviewer)- 添加註釋
觀察者(Observer)- 僅接收文本變更
在任何特定情境中,檔案管理員(Archivist)或排版員(Typesetter)都可以被賦予適合該情境的功能(審閱者、顧問或管理員)
@CrazyRocky this is one of those interesting discussions where if you ask 10 people you get 11 answers. For me one issue is that we are mixing titles and functions. For example, as a typesetter I usually want the function of an Administrator because I (me personally) need to be able to make changes to settings and adjust text. I realize that not all typesetters do that.
I definitely think that the role of Reviewer should be separated and given a lesser function (as you have defined).
Having said that, I would prefer to just use the titles: “Consultant” and “Reviewer” with the definitions that you created. Someone who is a typesetter could be given whichever role the team and typesetter deem correct for that situation.
So, in the end we end up with five titles/functions:
Administrator - add notes, edit text, change settings
Translator - add notes and edit text
Consultant - add notes and have ability to act as a temporary administrator
Reviewer - add notes
Observer - only receive changes to the text
In any given context the Archivist or Typesetter can be given the appropriate function for that context (reviewer, consultant, or administrator)
機器翻譯自 English