0 голосов
203 просмотров

Feature love: I love the ability to add a project note from the Biblical Terms Tool. However, what I thought might be an issue is becoming one in actuality.

Frustration: The team I am working on has multiple people creating project notes (not uncommon in Seed Company and SIL since advisers and consultants come and go, furlough, ask for someone else to temporarily cover a project for them, etc.)

If an adviser or consultant is working from the Biblical Terms tool, they will generally not see the notes someone else (or they themselves) have made. I am now beginning to see multiple notes essentially saying the same thing. Sometimes one note is from a previous consultant who noticed an issue a year or two ago, and the ‘repeat note’ is from another person (me!) working from the Biblical Terms tool and not realizing the same idea has already been captured in a note. Sometimes two similar notes can be created just a few days apart by the same person when working through name dense texts, e.g. Table of Nations, geneaologies, etc.

Example: Right now I am trying to clean up 1 Chron 1-9, Gen 1 and in some cases the geneaologies in the Gospels. So the tool is very helpful and yet fairly frustrating since as a consultant and not a translator I cannot simply edit the text. I must leave notes. For some teams the notes might be able to reside in the Biblical Terms tools (though we generally only use those discussion notes for discussing the merits of a certain rendering and not telling the team ‘change this word at this location’). For the most part, once a rendering/spelling has been established for a name, then we put a project note at the 3-4 places that do not conform, because the team generally works through the text (not the Bib Terms tool) solving the various kinds of problems from project notes.

Additional weakness: (Even when working through the Biblical Terms tool, probably 10-20% of decisions cannot be properly made from that tool because it shows a single verse of text. Many times pronouns correctly refer back a verse or two, but this cannot be shown without going back to the main window.)

Suggestion: What would seem most helpful would be to show the project note tags in the Bib Term text boxes and allow a hover or open note to show the content of a tag. That way someone creating project notes in the Bib Terms tool would know if a similar note had already been created.

Another frustration: For those who work predominantly from the Bib Terms rendering window, if I am viewing a term say ‘Issakar’ and I realize that it should always be rendered as ‘Isakar’ - I cannot easily move to a quick way of viewing and editing all occurrences of the term. Some people would recommend using the Spelling tool, but I find the full Bib Terms tool is much better for finding missing renderings (besides the spelling tool not having an easy time finding all misspellings such as ‘Yissikar’). So it seems that the rendering window could benefit from having a way to jump to the full Bib Terms tools where all occurrence (or missing renderings) could be worked without losing the term and having to search for it all over again.

Старое сообщение — показано на исходном языке
Paratext от (184 очков) | 203 просмотров

2 Ответов

0 голосов

While you are right that it can be difficult to track down all the
misspelling options for a term in the spelling tool, it is very important
to use it to make the corrections. Three things are possible this way:

  1.  Misspellings are corrected in places that the Biblical Terms Tool
    

is not aware of like section titles, footnotes, intros, pictures, the
glossary, and perhaps a nearby verse.

  1.  The misspelling is marked wrong for the future so that there is no
    

more confusion about it.

  1.  It is much faster to effect the spelling change here than in the
    

Biblical Terms Tool and much safer than in the Find/Replace Tool.

One way to find the alternate misspellings in the Spelling Tool is to paste
the word in the find box and then delete the letters off the end (or
beginning depending upon your morphology) one by one.

I do agree with you that it would be nice for some integration between the
two tools since I find the above strategy difficult to teach to some teams.

Blessings,

Shegnada J.

Language Tecnology and Publishing Coordnator, Nigeria

Text Processing Specialist GPS Dallas

Skype: Shegnada.James.

+[Phone Removed]

Старое сообщение — показано на исходном языке
от (1,3тыс. очков)
0 голосов

Yes, I can see that there is nothing to keep a team from making project notes and Biblical terms rendering notes on the same topic. The two types of notes are not visible at the same time. I would echo Shegnada’s comments that it is best practice to have consistent spelling before using the Biblical terms tool. If there is disagreement on transliterated names, I would suggest that those be documented in the Biblical terms Tool and that the Biblical terms tool would be used as a guide to discussions about borrowed names. Ideally, there would be a policy set forth in the orthography statement about how names should be transliterated and this guide the translators from the beginning and every proper name would not have to be debated.

Старое сообщение — показано на исходном языке
от [Expert]
(2,9тыс. очков)

Похожие вопросы

0 голосов
3 ответов 484 просмотров
У меня есть внешний ресурс с заметками о различных ивритских словах, включая заметки и варианты перевода на местный язык, ... , а затем поиску этого слова в списке Biblical Terms.
mnjames 1,9тыс. задал вопрос ноя 10, 2022
0 голосов
1 ответ 434 просмотров
I've been very pleased with the new features in 7.6 but am trying to evaluate switching to Linux for Paratext etc (I ... Package manager only seems to contain Paratext 7.5 and 7.4.
rowbory 510 задал вопрос апр 26, 2016
0 голосов
2 ответов 361 просмотров
Do other people notice that 7.6 seems slow when you change verse? I and one other user have noticed this; we ... linked windows (windows in the same group, that advance together).
wdavidhj 1,4тыс. задал вопрос авг 5, 2015
+1 голос
1 ответ 195 просмотров
Мы связали Святой Дух (Asubane Noekene) с соответствующей записью в нашем глоссарии. Теперь мы также хотим связать ... затем вернуть всё обратно. Или есть ли лучшее решение?
Anne Stoppels 106 задал вопрос сен 18, 2024
0 голосов
1 ответ 208 просмотров
В языке, с которым я работаю, конечный гласный во многих словах может меняться в зависимости от контекста. Кроме того ... их работать с обоими вариантами? Спасибо за любые советы.
anon380150 242 задал вопрос янв 23, 2024
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
Just as a body, though one, has many parts, but all its many parts form one body, so it is with Christ.
1 Corinthians 12:12
3,048 вопросов
6,007 ответов
5,672 комментариев
2,027 пользователей