0
236 次瀏覽

As far as I can see anyone with the role of Consultant/Reviewer/Archivist/Typesetter is automatically given permission to control Biblical Terms and edit Renderings. Is there any reason for that? If so, I would like to be enlightened. It seems to me that the default option should be to not give that permission to this role, but actively give it if needed.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
Paratext (869 點) 提出 | 236 次瀏覽

2 個回答

0

Hello, Iver+Larsen.

I think that a Consultant profile has these permits because it is part of their job to identify terms or phrases that they think the translation team should observe for their specific translation.

Also, these two permissions do not modify the text (as opposed to spelling or permissions in books / chapters). So the permission for Biblical Term and Renderings do not interfere directly in the biblical text.
If a user is required to only make notes, Biblical Terms and Rendering permissions can be removed. I think there are fewer cases where you need to remove the permissions, so it’s not the default option.
(sorry for the bad english).

.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
(973 點) 提出
0

It is not very clear what these permissions do. The Help file has a brief and incomplete note:

Terms Giving a user permission for the Terms task allows that user to add terms to or remove terms from the Project Biblical Terms list.
Renderings Giving a user permission for the Renderings task allows that user to approve or deny renderings of Biblical Terms. Users can only resolve Biblical Term rendering discussion notes if they have been given permission for the Renderings task.

Should these rights automatically be given to a consultant? I would think these rights belong to the translator(s) with guidance from a consultant. I expect they would work together on this task. If a consultant needs to develop or manipulate the Project Biblical Terms list without input from the translators, he can be given that permission. If a consultant has made a discussion note, he should have the right to resolve it. I believe such a discussion note can be made without these two permissions, so I do not know why it needs permission to resolve the note.

The Renderings permission allows the consultant to edit the renderings for this language in addition to approving or denying the rendering used in a particular verse. I think these rights should be restricted to a translator or actively given to some consultants in some projects.

I do not think that a consultant would misuse these rights. I am only wondering why these rights are given as a default option. It complicates the issue that a consultant role is combined with the role of a reviewer/archivist/typesetter.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
(869 點) 提出

相關問題

0
1 個回答 25 次瀏覽
我記得在 Paratext 的舊版本中,可以在「聖經術語」工具視窗中搜尋討論備註的內容。現在我看不到這個選項了。我目前使用的版本是 9.5.109.1 先謝了 - fork
Fork 184 提出 已提問 12月 5, 2025
0
2 個回答 55 次瀏覽
一位使用者一直在「所有聖經術語」清單、「主要聖經術語」清單以及他的「專案聖經術語」清單中添加譯法,導致他核准的譯法並未全部集中在同一個清單中。有沒有辦法將所有譯法複製到「專案聖經術語」清單中?他們即將完成整本聖經的翻譯,如果手動執行此操作,工作量將非常龐大。
JeffSHR 110 提出 已提問 12月 10, 2024
0
1 個回答 181 次瀏覽
其中一個團隊想知道,是否有自動化的方式可以從「聖經術語」(Biblical Terms)中移除舊的譯法。
SamuelG 109 提出 已提問 8月 29, 2024
0
1 個回答 122 次瀏覽
我該如何將我的聖經術語清單篩選出僅包含有多種譯法的項目?感覺應該有一個正則表達式可以做到這一點,但我一直想不出來。
rmdiamondl 336 提出 已提問 7月 19, 2024
0
1 個回答 305 次瀏覽
假設譯者為 προσκαλέω 選擇了兩種依語境而定的譯法:我們可以將其簡釋為 "call.to.come" 和 "send.someone.to.bring" 基於詞根的匹配運作良好,因此將這兩種譯法輸入 key terms renderings 工具後,會 ... - 只是目前似乎無法做到這一點.... a 請告訴我我錯了,並且某處隱藏著一個控制選項?
DG 1.1k 提出 已提問 11月 29, 2023
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
And over all these virtues put on love, which binds them all together in perfect unity.
Colossians 3:14
3,045 個問題
6,005 個回答
5,671 則評論
2,026 位使用者