0
235 次浏览

As far as I can see anyone with the role of Consultant/Reviewer/Archivist/Typesetter is automatically given permission to control Biblical Terms and edit Renderings. Is there any reason for that? If so, I would like to be enlightened. It seems to me that the default option should be to not give that permission to this role, but actively give it if needed.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
Paratext (869 分) 发布 | 235 次浏览

2 个回答

0

Hello, Iver+Larsen.

I think that a Consultant profile has these permits because it is part of their job to identify terms or phrases that they think the translation team should observe for their specific translation.

Also, these two permissions do not modify the text (as opposed to spelling or permissions in books / chapters). So the permission for Biblical Term and Renderings do not interfere directly in the biblical text.
If a user is required to only make notes, Biblical Terms and Rendering permissions can be removed. I think there are fewer cases where you need to remove the permissions, so it’s not the default option.
(sorry for the bad english).

.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
(973 分) 发布
0

It is not very clear what these permissions do. The Help file has a brief and incomplete note:

Terms Giving a user permission for the Terms task allows that user to add terms to or remove terms from the Project Biblical Terms list.
Renderings Giving a user permission for the Renderings task allows that user to approve or deny renderings of Biblical Terms. Users can only resolve Biblical Term rendering discussion notes if they have been given permission for the Renderings task.

Should these rights automatically be given to a consultant? I would think these rights belong to the translator(s) with guidance from a consultant. I expect they would work together on this task. If a consultant needs to develop or manipulate the Project Biblical Terms list without input from the translators, he can be given that permission. If a consultant has made a discussion note, he should have the right to resolve it. I believe such a discussion note can be made without these two permissions, so I do not know why it needs permission to resolve the note.

The Renderings permission allows the consultant to edit the renderings for this language in addition to approving or denying the rendering used in a particular verse. I think these rights should be restricted to a translator or actively given to some consultants in some projects.

I do not think that a consultant would misuse these rights. I am only wondering why these rights are given as a default option. It complicates the issue that a consultant role is combined with the role of a reviewer/archivist/typesetter.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
(869 分) 发布

相关问题

0
1 个回答 25 次浏览
我记得在 Paratext 的早期版本中,我可以在“圣经术语”工具窗口中搜索讨论备注的文本。现在我看不到这个选项了。我当前使用的版本是 9.5.109.1 谢谢 - fork
Fork 184 发布 提问于 十二月 5, 2025
0
2 个回答 55 次浏览
一位用户一直在向 所有圣经术语 (All Biblical terms)列表 主要圣经术语 (Major Biblical terms)列表以及他的 项目圣经术语 (Project Biblical terms)列表中添加译法,导致他已批准的译法分散在不同的列表中, ... 项目圣经术语 列表中?他们即将完成整部圣经的翻译,如果手动操作,工作量将非常巨大
JeffSHR 110 发布 提问于 十二月 10, 2024
0
1 个回答 181 次浏览
有一个团队想知道是否有自动化的方法可以从“圣经术语”中移除旧的译法。
SamuelG 109 发布 提问于 八月 29, 2024
0
1 个回答 122 次浏览
如何将我的圣经术语列表筛选为仅包含具有多种译法的术语?似乎应该有一个正则表达式可以做到这一点,但我无法弄清楚。
rmdiamondl 336 发布 提问于 七月 19, 2024
0
1 个回答 305 次浏览
假设译员为 προσκαλέω 选择了 2 种语境敏感的译法:我们可以将其注释为 "call.to.come" 和 "send.someone.to.bring" 基于词根的匹配效果很好,因此将这两种译法输入到 关键术语译法 工具中会获得很多漂亮的勾 ... 根的匹配 - 只是目前似乎无法做到这一点.... a 请告诉我我错了,并且某处隐藏着某个控制选项?
DG 1.1k 发布 提问于 十一月 29, 2023
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
For where two or three gather in my name, there am I with them.
Matthew 18:20
3,045 个问题
6,005 个回答
5,671 条评论
2,026 位用户