0 votes
424 vues

I’m having trouble using \w … \w* markers when the word in the text is a different form of the word than is in the glossary.

I found in the online USFM documentation that I should be using a pipe (by the way, is there a pdf version of the USFM 3.0 documentation?).

When I type something like \w ہِرودِ|ہِرود\w* (note the small vowel point under the last letter) it solves my “Citation Form (“ہِرودِ”) is missing from the glossary: \w” errors, but both words are still showing in the text. No matter which of the views I go to (Preview, Basic, Formatted, Unformatted, or Standard) both words show.

In Preview view, which would typically remove the \w markers and replace them with a * before the word, the markers are gone but the * is not present.

Basic view is the only place where the glossary version (the second of the two words) is grayed out.

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine
Paratext par (1,9k points)
réaffiché | 424 vues

2 Réponses

0 votes
Meilleure réponse

Which version of Paratext are you using? What stylesheet is the project using?

I tried it in version 8.0.100.63 and it seems to work fine in a test project (Standard view):
image

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine
par [Expert]
(16,7k points)

I’m using 8.0.100.62.

In looking at stylesheets, I noticed my usfm.sty is version 2.503. Has usfm.sty version 3.0 not been incorporated into PT yet?

There was a fairly innocuous line in custom.sty pertaining to \w, but I removed it to no effect.

I’m not seeing that grayed out look in Standard view.

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine

No, the USFM 3.0 specification was only finalized a couple months ago so it has not been incorporated into any released version of Paratext, yet. Support for USFM 3.0 will be in 8.1 when it releases later this year.

However, having a pipe separating the parts of \w was in before USFM 3.0 so the version of the stylesheet you have should be fine. Could you tell me the name of the project with the problem (if it’s not sensitive)?

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine

I’ve sent an email.

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine
+1 vote

In case someone else has a similar issue, it turns out it was caused by the spell checking. If the word following the pipe (’|’) was marked as incorrectly spelled (or unknown), that caused the word to not show up in its typical gray color.

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine
par [Expert]
(16,7k points)

Questions connexes

0 votes
0 réponses 210 vues
Paratext ne peut trier automatiquement que les entrées du glossaire qui sont correctement liées dans l'outil des termes ... été modifiées et qui ne sont plus triées correctement.
[Expert]
Jeff_Shrum
2,9k
posée mars 23, 2021
0 votes
1 réponse 449 vues
I'm working on basic checks for a project, and it keeps coming up with Citation form (x) is missing from glossary every ... difference. (P.S. I am using Paratext 8.0.100.84)
Rɔnelh 199 posée nov. 16, 2019
0 votes
1 réponse 41 vues
Nous utilisons /xt dans les renvois de notes de bas de page, configuré pour utiliser le nom court du livre. ... -il un code USFM différent que je pourrais utiliser pour cela ?
Lenice 180 posée oct. 7, 2025
+1 vote
1 réponse 428 vues
Lorsque vous saisissez des entrées de glossaire via l'outil des termes bibliques ou la fenêtre des rendus des ... La vidéo suivante décrit également cette procédure en détail :
[Expert]
Jeff_Shrum
2,9k
posée mars 23, 2021
0 votes
1 réponse 403 vues
Je suis administrateur dans ce projet. Un autre administrateur a apporté des modifications dans le GLO et d'autres livres et a ... se sont pas mises à jour dans le livre du GLO.
anon399461 123 posée mars 13, 2024
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
Every day they continued to meet together in the temple courts. They broke bread in their homes and ate together with glad and sincere hearts, praising God and enjoying the favor of all the people. And the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved.
Acts 2:46-47
3,051 questions
6,010 réponses
5,676 commentaires
2,030 utilisateurs