我正在協助一位用戶，他最近為了排版準備添加了交叉引用。我認為他導入了一套標準的 UBS 交叉引用。在執行引用的基本檢查（Basic Checks）時，Paratext 會標記每個包含多個交叉引用的節中的第一個引用，並提示「a」是無效引用。同一節中後續的引用（標記為 b、c 等）則不會被標記為錯誤。我們嘗試自行排查，並發現如果刪除「a」，Paratext 就會將「b」標記為無效引用。當把「a」放回去並重新執行檢查時，「b」就不再被標記了。我們確實在語言設定中指定使用字母 a-n 進行節的分段。我們還需要做什麼才能解決這些錯誤？
I'm supporting a user who recently added cross references in preparation for typesetting. I believe he imported a standard set of UBS cross references. When running basic checks for references, paratext is flagging the first reference in every verse that contains multiple cross references, saying that "a" is an invalid reference. Subsequent references (marked b, c, etc) in the same verse are not flagged as errors. We did do a bit of fiddling to try to figure it out on our own, and we determined that if you delete the a, then paratext flags "b" as an invalid reference. When you put the "a" back in and rerun the check, "b" is no longer flagged. We did specify under language settings that the letters a-n should be used for verse segmentation. What else do we need to do to resolve these errors?
機器翻譯自 English
