In looking at your source text, you have two verbs separated by a comma. Perhaps unexpectedly, your phrasal verb rule is running and it seems to be a quirk of Apertium that when you have some stuff (like a comma) between two words and both words get matched for a rule, any additional thing that gets put out before word 2 is going to come after the stuff.
You probably don't want the phrasal verb rule firing in this case anyway. You can capture the comma by making it part of your sentence ending punctuation. In this way commas will be in their own lexical unit. And a pattern like v v won't match because the data stream will be v sent v. Now if you are interested in matching across a comma (or other sentence punctuation) you would have to include 'sent' in the pattern.
P.S. Your first image was almost unreadable. Please make it a little higher resolution.