根據你所寫的內容，我會這樣撰寫：
\m \v 1 大衛的詩篇。
你可能必須使用 custom.sty 來重新定義 \q1-\q4 的某些特徵，因為它們的外觀可能與預期不同。此外，你還需要在那裡定義新的標記 \zq5-\zq???。當然，你也會希望確認負責排版你的聖經的人員同意並遵循你的新標記（請參閱此回覆的其餘部分）。
但是，我會強烈反對「專案中至少有 15 層縮排」這種說法。為什麼？你有考慮過這在印刷品上實際看起來會是什麼樣子嗎？
1) 許多資助書籍實際印刷的機構對聖經的版面設計有嚴格規定，因為他們希望節省成本。因此，他們的規定傾向於盡量節省頁面。這意味著字體要小、縮排要短，並盡量減少空白空間。
2) 即使金錢不是問題，我認為你上述的提案在印刷品上會看起來相當醜陋，我願意假設並表示，我說的話代表了大多數排版人員的看法。那種瀑布式的排版，下方留有大量空白，看起來並不美觀，我也不確定它有助於理解。
Looking at what you've written, I'd write it up like this:
\m \v 1 A Psalm of David.
You would probably have to use custom.sty to redefine some of the features of \q1-\q4, since they wouldn't look as you'd expect. And you'd need to also define new markers \zq5-\zq??? there. Of course, you'll also want to verify that whoever is going to typeset your Bible will agree and follow your new markers (see the rest of this reply).
But, I'd also push back extremely strongly on "There are at least 15 levels of indentation in the project." Why? Have you considered how this will actually look in print?
1) A lot of funders for the actual printing of books have strict rules on how Bibles should be laid out because they want to be economical. Thus their rules tend to promote saving as many pages as possible. This means small fonts, short indents, and as little white space as possible.
2) Even if money isn't an issue, I think what you're proposing above would look quite ugly in print and I'm willing to presume and to say that I'm speaking for most typesetters when I say that. That sort of waterfall with lots of blank space below it doesn't look nice and I'm not convinced it would aid in understanding.
機器翻譯自 English 顯示原文
