No projeto em que estamos trabalhando, para evitar reanálises desnecessárias ou a manutenção de listas separadas, estamos marcando itens do glossário que foram verificados pela equipe, testados e verificados por consultores com marcos independentes, por exemplo:
\p
\v 2 \k phivli\k* Ʒuvli/rromni kaj mulǎs laqo rrom, vëduva, vädana. \zteamchecked\* \ztested\* \zconschecked\*
\Marker ztested
\Name tested glossary item
\Description Has a glossary item been tested yet?
\OccursUnder id p
\StyleType Milestone Quando executo os Basic Checks, sou inundado por entradas que parecem com esta:
GLO 1:5 #Missing milestone end: \ztested
GLO 1:5 #Missing milestone end: \zteamchecked
GLO 1:5 #Missing milestone end: \zconschecked
Estou perdendo alguma coisa na entrada do custom.sty que está impedindo os Basic Checks de aceitar as entradas? Eu quero ser avisado sobre um fim genuinamente perdido (ou seja, se havia uma linha que terminava com \zteamchecked \ztested \*), então não quero negar todas as mensagens.
In the project that we are working on, in order to avoid needless rechecking or keeping separate lists, we are marking glossary items that have been team checked, tested and consultant checked with stand-alone milestones, e.g.:
\p
\v 2 \k phivli\k* Ʒuvli/rromni kaj mulǎs laqo rrom, vëduva, vädana. \zteamchecked\* \ztested\* \zconschecked\*
\Marker ztested
\Name tested glossary item
\Description Has a glossary item been tested yet?
\OccursUnder id p
\StyleType Milestone When I run basic checks, I am spammed by entries looking like this:
GLO 1:5 #Missing milestone end: \ztested
GLO 1:5 #Missing milestone end: \zteamchecked
GLO 1:5 #Missing milestone end: \zconschecked
Am I missing something in the custom.sty entry that is stopping Basic Checks from accepting the entries? I do want to be warned about a genuine missed end (i.e. if there was a line that ended \zteamchecked \ztested \*), so I don't want to deny all the messages.
Tradução automática de English Mostrar original
