重新发布为新帖,而不是回复旧帖。
是否有标准方式来请求向 Paratext 添加新资源,或者扩展 Paratext 中已可用资源的可用组织范围?
我看到 DBL 中有几项韩语资源未在 Paratext 中提供。还有一些资源虽然在 Paratext 中可用,但仅限于特定组织使用,而逻辑上它们似乎应该更广泛地可用(例如,向已批准组织的子组织开放)。在这种情况下,我想知道是否是因为某些组织被批准使用这些资源,随后又添加了更多组织(或子组织)……
过去几天里,我们收到了两次关于(额外)韩语资源的请求。
对于未在 Paratext 中的资源:在 DBL 中,我可以看到其中一项来自 Biblica,他们现在更积极参与 Paratext。另一项来自韩国圣经公会,该公会已批准两项韩语资源在 Paratext 中使用。也许这些细节对我们有利?但接下来,谁是最合适的人选,去与这些组织联系以请求这些更改?
在 Paratext 中可用的资源可供某些父组织使用,但可供使用的子组织不多(?),这可能只是疏忽所致。以下是一些示例:加粗的组织拥有访问权限,未加粗的组织没有:
SIL International SIL Pacific Area SIL Asia Mainland Area CanIL 因此,这的一部分是流程问题(最佳做法是什么,谁应该发起联系?),另一部分是具体问题(是否有可能让这些韩语资源可用或更广泛地可用?)。
谢谢,
james_post
Reposting as a new , instead of a reply to an old one.
Is there a standard way to request new resources be added to Paratext, or to expand the orgs resources already in Paratext are available to?
I see a few resources in Korean in the DBL that are not in Paratext. And some are available in Paratext, but are restricted to specific organizations when it seems logical that they would be more widely available (i.e., to sub-orgs of already approved orgs). In this case, I’m curious if what happened is certain organizations were approved to use them, and then more organizations (or sub-organizations) were added…
We’ve had 2 different requests in the last few days regarding (additional) Korean resources.
For the resources that are not in Paratext: In the DBL, I can see that one is from Biblica, and they are now more involved in Paratext. And the other is from the Korean Bible Society, which has already approved 2 Korean resources for use in Paratext. Maybe those details would work in our favor? But then who is the best person to initiate contact with those orgs to request these changes?
The ones that are available in Paratext are available to some parent orgs, but not many (?) sub-orgs, which may just be an over-sight. Some examples are below: bolded orgs have access, non-bolded orgs to do not:
SIL International SIL Pacific Area SIL Asia Mainland Area CanIL So part of this is a process question (what’s the best way to do this and who should initiate contact?), part of it is a specific question (would it be possible to make these Korean resources available/more widely available?).
Thanks,
james_post
机器翻译自 English 显示原文