KimB 您好,
Logos / TW 中有一份標題為以下內容的文件:
SIL International. (1995). Old Testament Selections: A Help for Those Who Are Planning a Shorter Old Testament . SIL International.
該文件提出了四種方法:
40% 舊約選本(UBS:Smalley)
27% 舊約選本(PNG)
10% 舊約選本(AAIB)
新約時序教學選本(NTM Chronological Teaching Selections)
關於 27% 的舊約選本(PNG),文中提到:「這是 S.I.L 舊約全景的第二版修訂。它經過修訂、擴充,並採用了不同的格式。」
我們最初是從 40% 的 UBS 舊約開始,但當翻譯人員帶著他們所選前幾卷書的草稿回來時,他們已經翻譯了全部內容!他們的原因是:「我們就是無法省略任何內容!」從那以後,他們一直堅持翻譯 100% 的舊約。
Paul
Hi KimB,
There’s a document in Logos / TW with the title:
SIL International. (1995). Old Testament Selections: A Help for Those Who Are Planning a Shorter Old Testament . SIL International.
It presents four approaches:
40 percent Selection for OT (UBS:Smalley)
27 percent Selection for OT (PNG)
10 percent Selection for OT (AAIB)
NTM Chronological Teaching Selections
Of the 27% OT (PNG) it says, “This is the second revision of the S.I.L Old Testament Panorama. It has been revised, expanded, and given a different format.”
We started with the 40% UBS OT, but when the translators came back with the drafts of the first books they had chosen, they had done everything! Their reason? “We just couldn’t leave stuff out!” They’ve stuck with the 100% OT since then.
Paul
機器翻譯自 English 顯示原文