KimB 你好，
Logos / TW 中有一篇文档，标题为：
SIL International. (1995). Old Testament Selections: A Help for Those Who Are Planning a Shorter Old Testament. SIL International.
它介绍了四种方法：
40% 旧约选本 (UBS:Smalley)
27% 旧约选本 (PNG)
10% 旧约选本 (AAIB)
NTM 按时间顺序的教学选本
关于 27% 旧约 (PNG)，文中提到：“这是 S.I.L 旧约全景图的第二次修订版。它经过修订、扩充，并采用了不同的格式。”
我们最初采用的是 40% UBS 旧约，但当译员们带着他们所选前几卷书的草稿回来时，他们竟然把整本旧约都译完了！他们的理由是什么？“我们实在舍不得删减任何内容！”从那以后，他们一直沿用 100% 的旧约。
Paul
Hi KimB,
There’s a document in Logos / TW with the title:
SIL International. (1995). Old Testament Selections: A Help for Those Who Are Planning a Shorter Old Testament. SIL International.
It presents four approaches:
40 percent Selection for OT (UBS:Smalley)
27 percent Selection for OT (PNG)
10 percent Selection for OT (AAIB)
NTM Chronological Teaching Selections
Of the 27% OT (PNG) it says, “This is the second revision of the S.I.L Old Testament Panorama. It has been revised, expanded, and given a different format.”
We started with the 40% UBS OT, but when the translators came back with the drafts of the first books they had chosen, they had done everything! Their reason? “We just couldn’t leave stuff out!” They’ve stuck with the 100% OT since then.
Paul
机器翻译自 English
