我們很喜歡基本檢查（Basic Checks）功能。請定期使用它們。
有一個問題是 PT 無法應對真實語言的現實情況：我們收到太多關於「段落結尾缺少標點符號」的錯誤誤報。只要涉及引號，就會出現這種情況。
請考慮以下情況：「這個德語句子的標點符號和引號都是正確的。」（為了起草目的，我們可以使用鍵盤上那些醜陋的引號。） 還有：「Cette phrase française a une ponctuation et des guillemets corrects !」 但是這個元素 " 在「單獨使用」時是無效的。
因此，在多種語言中，將標點符號放在引號內部是有效的。我找不到如何告訴 PT 接受這種做法。「標點符號」的基本檢查非常重要，不能只是「驗證任何內容」或「拒絕整個章節」。輸入錯誤確實會發生，標點符號也不例外，我們希望捕捉到這些錯誤。如果誤報太多，會使我們警覺性降低。
所以，如果有一個我遺漏的設定，請告知。讓我感到困惑的是，" 在標點符號清單視窗中被列為「標點符號」，而在引號規則視窗中又被列為「引號元素」。如果 " 真的被視為標點符號項目，為什麼我看不到組合 ." 被列為可以驗證的內容？
這導致了另一個問題，這可能是真正的問題所在：PT 可以非常細緻地根據詞首、詞尾、詞中、孤立等情況來區分標點符號，但標點符號元素的組合卻完全未被考慮，它們被列為「孤立」。對於檢查真實語言來說，標點符號元素（簇）之間的相互作用很重要，應該將其編程實現。
如果這樣做了，我相信我就可以驗證常見的所需組合，如 ."，從而間接解決「段落結尾問題」。
你可能會感受到我的挫敗感。但這不是抱怨，而是一種求助的呼喊。這就像一位母親為她深愛的孩子（語言）尋求幫助，這個孩子眼睛長在頭後面，而學校制度不允許她坐在教室後面面向前方。
編輯：我有一種似曾相識的感覺。我幾年前是否提交過類似的問題？還是我一直獨自默默忍受？我在建立新主題之前總是會進行搜索，但找不到這個問題。如果已經有答案了，請不要生氣，並請發送連結。
We like our basic checks. Use them regularly.
There is one issue where PT does not cope with the realities of real languages: We get far too many false errors about “punctuation missing at end of paragraph”. We get this every time where quotations are involved.
Consider this: “This German sentence has correct punctuation and correct quotation marks.” (For drafting purposes we can use the ugly ones from the keyboard.) And: “Cette phrase française a une ponctuation et des guillemets corrects !” But this element " is not valid “in isolation”.
So it is valid in several languages to have the punctuation inside quotation marks. I have not found, how to tell PT to accept this. The basic check “punctuation” is far too important to just “validate anything” or to “deny for entire chapters”. Typing errrors do happen, also in punctuation, and we want to catch those, Getting too many false errors would dull our alertness.
So if there is a setting that I have missed, please advise. What is puzzling to me as user, is that " are listed as “punctuation” in the punctuation-inventory window and then as “quotation element” in the quotation-rules window. If " are really considered a punctuation-item, why do I not see the combination ." listed as something that I can validate?
This leads to another issue which might be the real problem: PT can very finely distinguish punctuation according to word-inital, word-final, word-medial, isolated etc. but combinations of punctuation-elements are so much not-considered that they are listed as “isolated”. For checking real languages, the inter-play of punctuation elements (clusters) is important and should be programmed.
If this were done, then I could validate common needed combinations like ." and the “end of paragraph problem” would be indirectly solved, I believe.
You might feel my frustration. But this is not a complaint, rather a cry for help. Here is a mother asking for help for her beloved child (language) who has got her eyes at the back of her head and the school system does not allow her to sit facing the back of the class.
edit: I have a sense of déjà-vu. Did I submit a similar question once before, a few years ago? Or have I just quietly suffered this by myself? I always do searches before I create a new thread but could not find this issue. If there is an answer already, please do not be angry and please send the link.
機器翻譯自 English
