而且你使用的是 Windows 还是 Linux，@anon692560？
我使用 Linux 版本的 Paratext 已经有一段时间了。我很欣赏能在“开源”环境中运行它。我使用的是 Wasta 20.04（几周前刚安装），Paratext 最近更新到了 9.0.100.10256。当 Wasta 提示时，我会应用系统和安全更新，所以我认为我的操作系统是最新的。我有 16 GB 内存，i5 @ 2.3 GHz 处理器——我的电脑处理大多数事情都相当有能力。但 Paratext——以及很大程度上 FLEX——慢得几乎无法忍受。
Paratext 需要大约两个小时才能用完 1.7 GB 或更多的内存，此时任何任务都变得很吃力——点击某处然后等待、等待、等待，久到你开始怀疑你的点击是否真的被注册了；打字时不确定你在单词中的位置或是否犯了错误，因为文本出现需要几秒钟；等等。达到 2.0 GB 时，是时候关闭 PT 并重新开始攀登“内存山”了……[我养成了习惯，在 PT 中工作时关闭任何我不绝对需要打开的东西——浏览器、文字处理器，甚至 Logos（这是适得其反的……）——只是为了释放内存。我没想到 16 GB 中的 2 GB 会成为决定性因素。
]
说到关闭 PT，这意味着进入系统监视器并点击“结束进程”，因为即使 Paratext 从屏幕上消失，它仍然驻留并将其中一个处理器核心固定在 100%（总量的 25%）。有一次我让它运行了几个小时，进程从未自行结束……[我已经为此提交了日志，但不知道结果如何。]
我曾希望升级到 Wasta 20.04 和 Paratext 9.0.100 会有帮助，但它与我使用 Wasta 18.04 和早期版本 PT 的体验差不多。不幸的是，它没有帮助。我一直在想这是否只是我的体验，但我从其他几位 Linux 用户那里听说他们的情况也是如此。现在还有你，@anon692560……我想知道我们是否可以做些什么来改善这种情况。
And are using Windows or Linux, @anon692560?
I’ve been using the Linux version of Paratext for a while. I do appreciate the ability to run it in a “foss” environment. I’m using Wasta 20.04 (fresh install a few weeks ago), and Paratext recently updated to 9.0.100.10256. I apply system and security updates when Wasta prompts, so I think I’m up to date OS-wise. I’ve got 16 GB of RAM, an i5 @ 2.3 GHz processor–my computer handles most anything quite capably. But Paratext–and to much the same extent, FLEX–is almost unbearably slow.
It takes about two hours for Paratext to use up 1.7 GB of memory or more, at which point any task becomes a struggle–click something and wait and wait and wait long enough that you begin to wonder if your click really registered; type and not be sure where you’re at in the word or if you made a mistake because it takes a few seconds for the text to appear; and so on. At 2.0 GB, it’s time to shut PT down and start the climb up “memory mountain” all over again… [It has become my practise to shut down anything I don’t absolutely need open when I’m working in PT–browser, word processor, even Logos (which is counter-productive…)–just to free up memory. Not that I would have thought 2 GB out of 16 would be a deal breaker.]
When it comes to shutting down PT it means going into System Monitor and clicking “End Process”, because even after Paratext disappears from the screen it stays resident and has one of the processor cores pegged at 100% (25% of total). I left it for a few hours once, and the process never ended on its own… [I have submitted logs for this, but I don’t know what ever came of that.]
I had hoped that upgrading to Wasta 20.04 and Paratext 9.0.100 would help, but it’s pretty much the same as my experience with Wasta 18.04 and earlier versions of PT. Unfortunately, it hasn’t helped. I had been wondering if this is just my experience, but I’ve heard from a few other Linux users that it’s the same for them. And now you, @anon692560… I’m interested to learn if there’s anything we can do to improve the situation.
机器翻译自 English
