我刚读到一篇关于只对项目的一部分进行 S/R(发送/接收)可能性的不同文章。
(部分发送/接收的可能性 - sflint 的第 3 条回复)
我理解 james_post 提到的问题,即人们可能会忘记上传整个项目。
。
然而,我认为增加“发送”和“接收”按钮会很有益。
团队经常一起编辑一本书(面对面或通过视频通话)。为了确保每个人拥有最新版本,整个团队必须定期进行两轮 S/R。第一轮实际上只是发送。第二轮实际上只是接收。
如果我们可以创建这些按钮,会怎样?
“仅发送”
功能:
仅发送项目。发送后五分钟内,如果用户未提前操作,它也会自动接收。
“仅接收”
功能:
仅接收项目。但如果项目在过去五分钟内未发送,则执行常规的发送和接收。
每个人先点击“仅发送”。完成后,他们再点击“仅接收”。
这可以节省团队大量的等待时间,并减轻服务器的负担。
当然,缺点是需要额外的复杂性和额外的培训。
这只是我想了很久的一個想法!我知道这可能不切实际,但还是想分享一下。
I just read a different about the possiblity of doing S/R of just part of a project.
(Partial send/receive possibility - #3 by sflint)
I understand the issues james_post mentions with people forgetting to upload their entire project.
However, I have thought that it would be beneficial to have additional “send” and “receive” buttons.
Oftentimes a team is editing a book together (in person or via videocall). In order to ensure everyone had the most up-to-date version, the entire team must periodically do two rounds of S/R. The first round is really just to send. The second round is really just to receive.
What if these buttons could be created?
“Just Send”
Function:
Just sends the project. Five minutes after sending it will also receive, if not initiated sooner by the user.
“Just Receive”
Function:
Just receive the project. But if the project hasn’t been sent within the last five minutes, do a regular send and receive.
Everyone would hit “Just Send” first. Once that is done, they all hit “Just Receive.”
This could save teams a lot of waiting time and reduce burdens on the servers.
Of course, a disadvantage would be the extra complexity and extra training needed.
Just an idea I’ve had for a while! I understand it might not be practical, but wanted to share it anyway.
机器翻译自 English