I’m intrigued that an upgrade installer would need access to the original installer.
Or, put it another way, if someone sends me a ZIP file, and I decide I want to keep the files on my storage in uncompressed format, then I decompress and, once that’s done, delete the ZIP file. But an installer that installs its content and then copies itself to the same drive seems like you’re keeping both the compressed and the uncompressed versions of pretty much the same data. I might be tempted to exclaim, “what a waste of storage space!”
I know that installers may not install all that’s in them because, say, 32-bit and 64-bit systems might need different files. But still, is there not a better – a more economical – way?
I’m still tempted to move these files to my other drive, and temporarily move them back whenever I do an upgrade.